1976.09.22 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

planning Commission Meeting September 22, 1A76 page 5 of 11 Dale: I gree with the recommendation of Mrs. Peltier. Under the 4mXistina zoning, much cf the land to the South bf Mr. Wunderlich is zoned. Conservancy and should be changed from Conservancy to ^.aricul- tural. This is not land to be preserved - the ponds are polluted because cattle are there. To the North, it is a different situ=ition. This rezoning request is valid. Francis Peltier Francis Peltier, 13094 Goodview Avenue North, requesting rezoning. from RR1 to ;agricultural of twenty acres described as follows: "E1 of T.41 of the SE -1 in Sec. 29, T11, R21, containing 20 acres. Also requesting rezoning from Conservancy to ^grlcultural of nineteen acres described as follows: "Ei of the NEI of the NTEI of ;ec. 32, T319 R21, except S 165 feet of the East 264 feet," Mrs. Peltier stated the � 19 acres now zonedonservancy f is low and In wet years is wet and unsuitable for homesites. The twenty acre parcel is suitable for agriculture all the t ime and part 'is, suitable for homesites. The peltier's plan to continue farming on both parcels. Dale recommended leaving the nineteen acres in 'Conservancy, and rezoning the twenty acres to avricultural. Aldine Anderson Aldine Anderson, 14728 Irish ,,venue North, requesting rezoning from Agricultural to RRI of the eight ^cres described as follows: "All that part of the SE -1 Q of the Vj vlJl of Sec. 23 lying ;:est of 4. the public highway in 7011', R21W of the fourth meridian." Anderson: Is three acres considered R.R1? Spitzer: Yes. Anderson: I just want permission to build one more house on the property. Carl Dale: What we have is good soil on the North and South side but the remainder of the land has very poor soil with severe limitations. I think Mr. Anderson should apply for a variance rather th-r, a rezon- ing - based on the size and shape of his land. His problem is the size and shape of his land. Larry Hanson: Is it my understanding that this kind of a case can be handled through a variance instead of a rezoning? Spitzer: Mr. Dale has suggested that the proper route would be a variance. The chair feels that it is not possible the way our ordinance is :,rawn up. I feel we have two choices 1) do a spot rezoning or 2) leave the parcel zoned the way it is.