Laserfiche WebLink
Hugo Planning Commission <br />October 13, 1976 <br />Page 2 of <br />Marilyn Mertens: Who would use this area if it were opened that <br />do not use now? Will you take the easement the government does <br />have and pave and develop it? <br />Holmberg: Majority of use would stay in immediate area. Better road <br />would be likely. <br />Spitzer: I was under the impression all the development cost would <br />be borned by the Metropolitan Park Commission and maintenance by <br />Ramsey County. <br />Holmberg: Was not sure what was stated previously. Area of road <br />would probably be maintained half by Hugo and half by Ramsey County. <br />Kevin Farley: Are you going to build a road and then put in sewer? <br />Holmberg: Matter would be coordinated with the city. <br />Sally Lemker: Would park encourage increased traffic of motorized <br />vehicles (snowmobiles, motorcycles) rather than biking and walking? <br />Holmberg: Snowbilers would have to abide by existing regulations. <br />Chairman Spitzer asked for a straw vote from the local residents in <br />attendance. The overall concensus was the dismissal of any Open <br />Space program. <br />Ehret made motion, seconded by Peltier, to dismiss any further dis- <br />cussion with Ramsay County in regards to acquisition of land on <br />Bald Eagle lake. <br />Voting for: Spitzer, Ehret, Peltier, Peloquin, and Greger. <br />Motion Carried. <br />Recessed 9:07 P.M. Reconvened 9:14 P.M. <br />Rezoning Requests <br />Mr. Bill Schwab indicated it would be easier to study proposed re - <br />zonings from the new zoning maps presented. <br />MallingIr <br />Peloquin stated he found zoning acceptable as presented on map. <br />Peloquin made motion, seconded by Peltier, that the Planning Commission <br />recommend approval to the City Council the rezoning of 73'! aCres�o� <br />from Conservancy to Agricultural as presented on new zoning map. <br />Voting for: Spitzer, Ehret, Peloquin, Peltier, and Greger. <br />Motion carried. <br />