Laserfiche WebLink
Hugo Planning Commission <br />November 10, 1976 <br />Page 2 of <br />letter to Mr. Perron in regards to what will be needed before <br />applying for variance. <br />Recessed 8:50 P.M. Reconvened 9:02 P.M. <br />Mr. Schwab presented revised map as to be presented to City Council <br />for consideration at their meeting of November 15, 1976. Mr. <br />Schwab stated that Mr. Carl Dale suggested that the Conservancy <br />zoning as now on record be reevaluated because of new soil maps and <br />aerial views. <br />Motion made by Peltier, seconded by Ehret, to submit the revised <br />map and all data to the City Council for their action. <br />VOTING FOR: Spitzer, Ehret, Peloquin, Peltier, Rosenquist, Greger, <br />and Gillen <br />Motion Carried <br />Motion made by Rosenquist, seconded by Ehret, requesting authority <br />from the City Council to reevaluate the boundaries of the Conservancy <br />districts in city zoning, and to provide an amended report no later <br />than November, 1977. <br />VOTING FOR: Spitzer, Ehret, Peloquin, Peltier, Rosenquist, Greger, <br />and Gillen <br />Motion Carried <br />Motion made by Rosenquist, seconded by Ehret, to close the agenda <br />of December 8", 1976 to all other business, and take care of orga- <br />nizational concerns.of the Planning Commission. All aye. <br />Greger made motion, seconded by Peloquin, to amend the motion, de- <br />leting the words "closed to all other business". All aye. <br />Notion made by Peltier, seconded by Greger, to adjourn at 9:36 P.M. <br />Mary rnCreager, Secretary <br />Planning Commission <br />