Laserfiche WebLink
l , <br /> MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS <br /> OF THE HUGO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> NOME MB ER 12, 1975 <br /> Pub l i c Hearing <br /> The public hearing regarding a request for rezoning of the prop- <br /> erty at 9856 l40th Street North, owned by Gerald & Gillian Moe from <br /> Conservancy to Agricultural was opened at 7 :kOPM. The legal notice <br /> was read by Chairman Spitzer. <br /> Mr. Moe showed his plans to the people in attendance. He ex- <br /> plainedthat he had made ten soil borings sharing that the soil con- <br /> ditions are excellent where the home sites are located on the map <br /> he presented. He showed the location of the Pp erc tests and stated <br /> that the results of the tests were given to the Washington County <br /> Planning Department. He also stated that he would like ten home <br /> sites on the 95* Acre parcel. He explained la ined that the lot sizes vary <br /> p <br /> because of the terrain of the land. The road is on high terrain so <br /> that grading would be no problem. He explained he has two requests- <br /> changing the zoning from Conservancy to Agricultural, and varying <br /> the lot sizes, with a slightly lower density than an average 10 acres. <br /> M.Cammack: I don't understand what the per° tests are and what is <br /> meant by conservancy. <br /> Spitzer: Explained that the land was originally zoned conservancy not <br /> because the land would not support a pera test , but because of the <br /> large number of ponding areas. He said Mr. Moe has found a suitable <br /> building site for each lot and a satisfactory per° test has been made <br /> on each lot. He explained how the per° test is taken, and said fur- <br /> ther information could be obtained from the building inspector. <br /> Schwab : Stated he did feel each lot has a suitable building site. <br /> L.Shimota : What is the primary criteria used to determine whether it <br />