1975.11.12 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-10- be* further sub-divided without permission of the city of Hugo. Because the lots are larger than four acres, a gravel road would be sufficient . 11 As a subdivider, Mr. Moe would be required to either donate land or mon- ey, at the option of the Council. On parcels of five acres or larger, $100 to $200 per lot would be reasonable. Spitzer stated that they could not act on the special use permit since they did not first have the opinion of the city engineer. Leroux felt that Lot 2 should have the "pan " .,_ handle removed and probably added to lot three. Moe said that Lot 2 was that size and shape because the buyer for his home wanted 20 acres and this land was added to come up with the 20 acres. Ehret would like to see at least one lot eliminated making the total density smaller. Spitzer felt that If they allow him a density any smaller than 10 acres they are taking a very dangerous -SUR' He personally doesn't like the concept of having the smaller lots. He recommended getting the sense of the planning commission so they know *here to go from there. Motion made by Peltier, seconded by Leroux, that the sense of the planning commission is stated to be in favor of density zoning concept as applied to the Moe property. Voting aye : Leroux and Peltier. Vot- ing no: Spitzer and Ehret . Tie vote and the motion lost. Schwab said t ha t since there was only four members present , it would probably be adviseable to bring it up again at another meeting so we wouldn't be faced with .a tie vote. Motion mode by Ehret, seconded by Leroux, that the matter of the Moe 'Special Use Permit be tabled until the next subsequent meeting at which time the sense of the planning commission will be re-e tablished. Voting aye : Spitzer, Ehret, Leroux and Peltier. Motion carried. Schwab felt that it would be desireable to bring together the Planning Commission, the City Council, the Washington County Planner,