My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010.07.14 Parks Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Parks
>
Parks Commission
>
Parks Commission Agenda/Packets
>
2010
>
2010.07.14 Parks Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2016 4:08:27 PM
Creation date
6/22/2016 4:00:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
7/14/2010
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Parks
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
[ASHINGTON <br />� ONSERVAT'ION <br />I STRICT <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Shayla Syverson, Parks Planner; City of Hugo <br />FROM: Jyneen Thatcher, Natural Resource Specialist <br />DATE: June 28, 2010 <br />RE: Hanson parcel park site visit <br />1 380 W FRONTAGE- RD <br />H I G H W A Y 3 6 <br />STI LLWATE• R. MN 55082 <br />6 5 1- 2 7 5 1 1 3 6 1 P H O N E 1 <br />651-275 1254 1 FAX 1 <br />WWW.MNWC:D.ORG <br />It was a real pleasure meeting with you and Roger Clarke, to walk the former Hanson pit site and discuss <br />natural resource concerns related to the potential development of this parkland. This memo is intended as <br />a summary of our discussion, and documentation for future reference. <br />As I understand, design is still in the concept stage, but preliminary discussions have included ball fields <br />on a portion of the site, and trails for hikers, horses, and mountain bikes around the perimeter of the park <br />and as connectors across the park. Efforts are being made to preserve and utilize the existing topography. <br />My review of the site confirmed the MLCCS mapping on file for this parcel. No significant areas of <br />undisturbed native plant communities were observed. The majority of the site is covered with non-native <br />grasses with scattered trees, predominantly pasture grasses such as smooth brome and Kentucky <br />bluegrass, with weedy (orbs such as daisy fleabane, common mullein and red clovers. Within the <br />grassland were patches of true weeds — large areas of nodding thistle, Canada thistle, and spotted <br />knapweed. Those weeds should be controlled by mowing, herbicide treatment, or a combination of <br />methods. One area, north of the largest wetland, had some native remnant prairie plants — Monarda, <br />yarrow, and round -headed bllshelover. These are resilient species that have tolerated past disturbances <br />such as grazing or mowing, but appear to be limited to locations that had not been actively mined. <br />On the south and west sides, evergreens have spread into the parcel from the adjacent properties. While <br />these provide some habitat value, it is mostly as cover sites or as host to insects, which in turn feed birds. <br />At the old house site, the dominant tree is silver maple, with an understory of common buckthorn. Many <br />of the trees are split or with apparent dead branches. if this area is considered for future activity, the trees <br />should be evaluated for their health in regards to human safety around them. On the old spoil berms <br />around the perimeter of the mining operations, the dominant tree species is boxelder. These are pioneer <br />species, which quickly colonize disturbed ground. While they provide good wildlife habitat, 1 would not <br />object to removing some of them. Willows, cottonwood and green ash are also present on the berms and <br />low areas. These are all pioneer species that likely came in on the wind when the site was newly <br />disturbed. They appear to have found suitable microhabitats. <br />We looked at two significant wetlands. The first appears to be a natural wetland, likely a Type 4 deep <br />marsh, currently in a drawdown condition related to the prolonged dry cycle. Vegetation was dominated <br />by reed canarygrass and narrow -leaf cattails, with scattered clumps of more desirable vegetation such as <br />river bulrush and water plantain. This wetland straddles the south property line of the eastern 40 -acre <br />piece. The existing clump of cottonwood trees likely represent the maxinnun upland boundary, but the <br />wetland may extend farther north in a drier form of wetland (type 2, wet meadow). Keeping the trail on <br />the higher ground, overlooking the wetland, is a good idea, but if you consider placing a trail across the <br />Supervisors: Louise Smallidge ^ Gary Baumann o Tom Meyer ^ Rosemary Wallace ^ Sarah Hietpas. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.