My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016.01.13 Parks Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Parks
>
Parks Commission
>
Parks Commission Agenda/Packets
>
2016
>
2016.01.13 Parks Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2016 4:09:28 PM
Creation date
6/23/2016 12:52:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
1/13/2016
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Parks
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In terms of projecting use 5 years in the future, the highest increase in expected use by <br />respondents is "Visiting the Library in person," followed by "Use of on-line resources," <br />"To read or study," and "Take a class or learn a new skill." Virtually all other Library <br />services also showed expected increases, but at a lower percentage or rate. <br />Respondents think the Library is an important gathering place for their community, and <br />the physical location matters to them. <br />61% of those responding to the question agree or strongly agree that they are willing to <br />pay additional taxes for expanded Library services and hours. <br />Qualitative Inputs: Community Voices, Municipal Administrators Meetings, <br />Forums, Retreats <br />Qualitative data and input into a strategic planning process is often richer and more meaningful <br />in providing directions on community needs and desires than various "hard" data. Community <br />voices enrich the conversation, and provide much needed balance and perspective in the <br />process. Library Strategies and the Library conducted a wide range of offerings and venues for <br />County residents to share qualitative input into the process (see Methodology, page 2), all of <br />which provided rich data that will be useful to Library administration in looking at detailed <br />provision of service. Here, however, we summarize the major themes and findings heard <br />across these processes: <br />Washington County residents highly value their public libraries, and would like to see <br />enhanced services and facilities. <br />There is not clarity among Washington County residents as to what are Washington <br />County libraries versus associated libraries or community libraries. Most people <br />associate with the library nearest to them rather than the system. <br />Increasing and enhancing services to seniors is a priority, particularly in outreach, <br />technology training and support, and programming and lifelong learning activities. <br />Enhancing services to teens, at least in some areas of the Library system, is desired. <br />Creating dedicated, vibrant teen spaces in some of the system libraries seems to be the <br />major focus or need. <br />Early literacy is a concern across the County, however, most agree that the Library has <br />good early literacy services currently and the major area for improvement is in outreach <br />and public awareness. <br />Increased and enhanced programming and educational activities for all ages is desired. <br />It was widely noted, however, that the Library should not duplicate other offerings in <br />the community, particularly activities offered by community education programs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.