My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016.01.13 Parks Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Parks
>
Parks Commission
>
Parks Commission Agenda/Packets
>
2016
>
2016.01.13 Parks Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2016 4:09:28 PM
Creation date
6/23/2016 12:52:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
1/13/2016
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Parks
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
What is presented here, then, are considerations for Washington County as it moves into <br />planning for facilities development. Some of these factors are generic to all public libraries, <br />including reference to some standards or benchmarks, while others are more specific to <br />Washington County. The latter are based on findings from the strategic planning process, <br />including Library Strategies consultants' cursory assessment of the Library's facilities. <br />Here is a list of factors for consideration in the facilities planning process for Washington <br />County: <br />FACILITIES ARE TOOLS, NOT OUTCOMES — Public libraries should be designed to address <br />community needs or aspirations. Simply put, libraries should either be helping communities <br />make a needed change, and/or providing an enhancement to enrich the quality of life in a <br />community. Facilities should be planned around the need(s) to be address or the enrichment <br />value for the community. <br />IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT BUILDINGS — The core cost centers for libraries are staff, collections, and <br />facilities (and to some degree technology). While this has always been true, the trend in library <br />services today is toward areas like outreach, programming, and training/education, as well as <br />much more robust digital and website access (many libraries consider their websites as a <br />separate branch). Facilities are still needed for gathering, training, and yes, collections, but the <br />spaces are looking different, and the need for staff and operational support is greater than ever <br />for vibrant, well -used public libraries. <br />SERVICE EQUITY FOR ALL RESIDENTS — A goal for all large library systems is to provide <br />equitable service for all residents in its service area. This is challenging, because communities <br />or neighborhoods vary so the types of service should differ, but the level of service opportunity <br />should be comparable or parallel. An analogy would be if parents have two daughters and one <br />is pursuing ballet and the other ice hockey, the parents would support them in differing ways <br />but attempt to help them comparably. In short, the library should strive to provide <br />comparably meaningful service opportunities to all residents. This goal is challenging for <br />Washington County as the communities within the County vary considerably and their needs <br />for service also differ. There is no perfect answer to this balancing act, but in planning <br />facilities, the County will need to develop a plan that attempts to fulfill this goal of equitable <br />service. <br />THE LIBRARY SYSTEM AS A WHOLE — For a large system like Washington County, which is also <br />surrounded by available public libraries in other locales, no facility or service should be looked <br />at in isolation. The totality of the system should be considered, and services not offered at one <br />location may be balanced by an offering at a nearby location. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.