My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016.01.13 Parks Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Parks
>
Parks Commission
>
Parks Commission Agenda/Packets
>
2016
>
2016.01.13 Parks Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2016 4:09:28 PM
Creation date
6/23/2016 12:52:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
1/13/2016
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Parks
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESOURCES AVAILABLE — Facilities require funding, not only for bricks and mortar, but more <br />importantly for operational funding that allows the facility to remain open and offering service. <br />A great facility open only a few hours is unlikely to serve residents well, whereas as an <br />acceptable facility open greater hours may be more likely to provide superior service. <br />Determining long-term public and private support can be the critical factor in advancing a <br />facilities project. <br />QUALITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE — Because libraries today offer such a diverse range of <br />offerings and services, determining quality of service can be difficult. Is customer service most <br />highly valued or a large, easy -to -checkout collection? Or both? What are residents expecting <br />and what do they have for comparison. Because Washington County residents are mobile and <br />a high percentage use other metro area libraries, there may be expectations by some residents <br />for Washington County Library services, hours and facilities to match or even exceed peer <br />libraries in the region. <br />NEED FOR ENHANCED SERVICES — In the strategic planning process, a number of community <br />needs for increased or enhanced services that may affect facilities planning emerged. <br />Particularly, these needs included increasing services for seniors, especially for training, <br />programmatic and learning activities; enhanced spaces for programming, training, and <br />meetings; newer or more innovative spaces for teens; flexible spaces for use by workers, small <br />business owners, and self-employed individuals; and outreach to under -resourced households, <br />and families with small children. These expressed needs have many system ramifications, but <br />definitely point toward the need for more flexible, meeting/training type spaces across the <br />system, as well as possible exploration of larger, enhanced teen spaces in at least some <br />facilities. <br />PROJECTED USE, AND TYPE OF USE, BY TARGETED POPULATIONS — This is a difficult issue <br />faced by many libraries. Different populations use libraries at different rates, and use different <br />services at varying rates. For instance, women and highly educated individuals tend to use <br />libraries at higher rates than the general population, particularly for traditional services such as <br />check out of books. On the other hand, outreach services, workforce development, or strong <br />cultural programs may be needed and may have significant impacts on the households and <br />individuals in particular communities. While full-service libraries have some offerings, such as <br />strong collections, that may be used by the majority of communities within an area, <br />determining the need to target the service needs of particular populations, particularly <br />underserved communities, may be a critical factor in planning facilities and services. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.