Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA <br />MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS <br />Financial Analysis of the Government's Funds <br />As noted earlier, the City of Hugo uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with <br />finance -related legal requirements. <br />Governmental funds. The focus of the City of Hugo's governmental funds is to provide information on <br />near-term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in <br />assessing the City of Hugo's financing requirements. In particular, committed, assigned and <br />unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government's net resources available for <br />spending at the end of the fiscal year. <br />As of the end of the current fiscal year, the City of Hugo's governmental funds reported combined <br />ending fund balances of $15,836,138, a decrease of $4,426,473 from the prior year primarily as a result <br />of the refunding of the 2004 and 2005 general obligation bonds. The entire ending fund balance of the <br />governmental funds constitutes spendable fund balance, which is further classified as restricted, <br />committed, assigned or unassigned. <br />The general fund is the chief operating fund of the City of Hugo. At the end of the current fiscal year, <br />unassigned fund balance of the general fund was $2,422,714. As a measure of the general fund's <br />liquidity, it may be useful to compare the unassigned fund balance to total fund expenditures. <br />Unassigned fund balance represents 57 percent of total general fund expenditures. <br />The general fund's total fund balance increased by $106,265 during the current fiscal year. This year's <br />increase was primarily due to licenses and permit revenues in excess of expectations related to <br />increased building activity. Revenues in the general fund met or exceeded budget projections in all <br />cases. General fund expenditures met or were less than budgeted projections in all departments except <br />community development and as a fund overall. <br />The general obligations bonds fund decreased its fund balance by $5,730,367 for the year due primarily <br />to debt service payments, including the refunding of the 2004 and 2005 general obligation bonds, in <br />excess of property taxes and intergovernmental revenues allocated to this fund. The public <br />improvements fund increased its fund balance by $636,124 for the year due primarily to <br />intergovernmental revenues and collection of property taxes and special assessments in excess of <br />capital outlay expenditures. The property and equipment acquisition fund increased its fund balance by <br />$305,435 for the year due primarily to transfers from other funds. <br />The special revenue funds increased their fund balances by $317,771 for the year due primarily to <br />collection of property taxes and developer fees in excess of capital outlay expenditures. <br />The debt service funds (other than the general obligations fund as described as a major fund above) <br />have a total fund balance of $932,397 as of December 31, 2015. These fund balances decreased by <br />$61,701 for the year due primarily to transfers to other funds for bond principal and interest payments. <br />11 <br />