Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />June 23, 2016 <br />Page 7 <br />construction costs or required to pay full construction costs. Juba stated that she would like the Commission to <br />comment on if the improvements should still be considered and discussed with the applicant. <br />Commissioner McRoberts stated that given amount of traffic, yes. <br />Commissioner Rosenquist stated that he believes improvements will need to be made, but it is important that an <br />engineer looks at it taking into consideration the traffic from this development. <br />Susan Klingbeil, 5854 128th Alcove, approached the podium. She expressed concern for traffic and is worried <br />that adding this development will make it worse. She stated that they need to consider a four-way stop to get <br />onto 130th St. from the proposed development and Beaver Ponds development. <br />Juba stated that the intersection that connects to the Beaver ponds is anticipated to be evaluated in the traffic <br />analysis. Juba also expressed that with the 130th Street improvements it would be expected that a trail will be <br />constructed on the north side of 130th St. from TH 61 to Goodview. <br />Chair Kleissler asked if there has been any consideration making the trail loop. <br />Juba stated that it looks like there is one loop proposed, but doesn't know if the trail would be mulch or paved, <br />although the City does prefer paved trails. <br />Chair Kleissler believed that the developer should look for an opportunity to do some loops because that would <br />keep people on the trails rather than on streets or trying to cross TH 61. <br />Chair Kleissler wished the Planning Commission talk about the long roadway connecting the north and south of <br />the site. She stated that it was a long stretch. <br />Commissioner McRoberts wanted a traffic engineer to evaluate this road and believed there could be a lot of <br />traffic going on that road. <br />Commissioner Rosenquist believed the applicant understands the Commission's opinion on that road and the <br />need for a traffic engineer to study this road and figure out if there's something further that can be done. <br />Commissioner Knauss stated that it may need to have more curves to lessen the speed on the road. <br />Chair Kleissler stated that the current design looks like it would make a great opportunity for a cut through, so it <br />needs improvements. <br />Mr. Schmidt approached the podium. He stated that they are interested in making that road as residential as <br />possible because there are homes on it. He said they had designed some previous concepts that didn't have the <br />road cross the ditch, so the north and south of the site were not connected. He stated that he was interested in <br />the Planning Commissions feedback on losing connectivity compared to having a road that people might make a <br />shortcut through. He stated that they will look further into how they can calm traffic, but that the site offers <br />challenges to where the road can be located. <br />Commissioner Knauss believed the north and south of the site should be connected to provide more access in <br />and out of the development and spreads the traffic flow. <br />