My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016.08.25 PC Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2016 PC Packets
>
2016.08.25 PC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2016 2:36:39 PM
Creation date
8/22/2016 2:29:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
8/25/2016
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rachel.luba c j <br />From: Josh Berger <joshberger@outlook.com> <br />Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 9:25 AM <br />To: Rachel Juba <br />Cc: 'Colleen Brown'; 'Nancy T. Polomis; Becky Petryk <br />Subject: Sprouts Pediatric Dentistry <br />Dear Rachel — I am writing to you on behalf of the Victor Gardens Community Association's <br />Architectural Review Committee (ARC) and Master HOA with regard to the proposed Sprouts <br />Pediatric Dentistry in the South Village of our community. After careful review and discussion, we are <br />of the strong opinion that The Foundation Architects currently proposed design for Sprouts Pediatric <br />Dentistry is not appropriate for a commercial building within Victor Gardens. It is our opinion that a <br />few design modifications are required to ensure the building is a good fit for the neighborhood. Two <br />separate changes are necessary: <br />1.) Style: The proposed building exhibits elements of an architectural style that is not consistent with <br />other commercial or residential buildings within the neighborhood. Its most prominent design <br />elements on the front elevation (main entry "vestibule" and waiting area "tablet nook") have <br />characteristics that are not rooted in our neighborhood or Victor Gardens preferred design styles. <br />Specifically, the rooflines and flared walls have a whimsicallcartoonish look that are not <br />appropriate. The proposed building should reference design/style cues seen on existing commercial <br />buildings next door. <br />2.) Dormers: The proposed dormer design on the back and side elevations must visually align with <br />the elements beneath the roofline that they relate to. As they are designed, they do not relate to each <br />other logically or functionally. <br />While we recognize that the ARC may not technically have the authority to reject the proposed <br />plans on its own (after careful review of the governing documents by our lawyer), we strongly <br />believe that the Victor Gardens community should have a voice in the City's approval process, <br />since the plans as eventually approved will reflect on the entire Victor Gardens' community. <br />We are happy to discuss in greater detail should you have questions. We appreciate your <br />consideration of our opinions in this matter. <br />Warm Regards, <br />Josh Berger <br />President, Victor Gardens Master Home Owner's Association <br />651-334-9069 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.