My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017.01.17 CC Packet - Goal Setting Session
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2017 CC Packets
>
2017.01.17 CC Packet - Goal Setting Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2017 2:14:25 PM
Creation date
1/13/2017 2:11:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
1/17/2016
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
lower than the county's growth in population and the growth in inflation. However, inadequate state <br />resources threaten our ability to continue providing the core functions of county government at a <br />reasonable cost to county property taxpayers. <br />Washington County continues to implement service delivery changes in order to minimize costs. <br />However, in recent years, the state has eased its own fiscal problems by shifting certain costs and <br />responsibilities to the counties. <br />The combination of passing on costs, and inadequate increases in county aid to pay for increased costs <br />to provide mandated services, is eroding the few county services that serve the public at large. These <br />factors, when taken together, are significantly impairing our ability to maintain and expand our core <br />services during a period of increasing population and changing demographics, and the corresponding <br />pressure for citizen and safety net services. <br />Counties have identified many mandated services that could be repealed, reformed or funded. For <br />example, the state could eliminate the county share of certain state court costs, reduce the mental <br />health services maintenance of effort, eliminate recently adopted increases in the county cost share for <br />many human service programs, and eliminate costly requirements for publications of county financial <br />information and instead allow for web publication. <br />Support and Opposition: <br />Support will come from other counties and other local governments that seek mandate relief. <br />Opposition may come from those that support mandates. <br />Previous Consideration: <br />The county has advocated this position for many years. <br />No Action: <br />Counties will continue to be responsible for new, unfunded mandates that will likely result in increasing <br />pressure on local property taxpayers. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.