My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017.04.17 CC Minutes
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2017 CC Minutes
>
2017.04.17 CC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2017 1:07:52 PM
Creation date
5/3/2017 1:07:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
4/17/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for April 17,2017 <br /> Page 6 of 9 <br /> Planner Rachel Juba explained the Excelsior Group, LLC, was proposing to develop 216.6 acres <br /> of property, consisting of seven parcels, into 319 single family residential lots and ten outlots to <br /> be known as "Adelaide Landing". The Planned Unit Development general plan proposed to <br /> rezone the property from Single Family Detached Residential(R-3) to Planned Unit <br /> Development (PUD), which would allow flexibility on lot sizes and setbacks. The property <br /> included wetlands and floodplain for a total buildable acreage of 146.2 acres. <br /> Juba explained that the minimum threshold for a mandatory Environmental Assessment <br /> Worksheet (EAW)per MN State Statute is 250 units, therefore, an EAW was required. <br /> The developer had worked with City staff to prepare an EAW, which is a document that <br /> analyzes, at a preliminary level, the effects a development has on the environment in regards to <br /> land use, geology, water resources, wildlife, air, noise, and transportation. The EAW had been <br /> sent out for public comment with a 30-day comment period, which ended on March 29, 2017. <br /> The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the EAW at its March 23, 2017, meeting, <br /> and staff drafted responses to all comments on the EAW, which was sent to all the agencies and <br /> others who had commented. The EAW identified areas where potential environmental effects <br /> exist and appropriate mitigation measure had been incorporated into the project plan. Staff had <br /> analyzed the EAW and plan as it relates to State Rules and found the project did not have the <br /> potential for significant environmental impacts; therefore, recommended the City Council <br /> approve the findings of fact and conclusions and the resolution approving the issuance of a <br /> negative declaration for the need of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). <br /> In addition, the proposed project included a proposal to fill 1.32 acres of wetlands associated <br /> with the construction of a single family development. The applicant proposed to purchase <br /> wetland bank credits at a 2:1 mitigation ratio in-advance of the proposed wetland impacts. The <br /> wetland delineation was approved by City staff in 2014 and 2016. The wetland replacement plan <br /> application was deemed complete on March 8, 2017, and public notice was sent on March 25, <br /> 2017, with an April 10, 2017, deadline to receive comments. Rachel explained the applicant's <br /> response to the public comment received was compared to the proposed plans/application and <br /> found satisfactory by City staff in fulfilling the replacement standards under MN Rules 8420. <br /> Ben Schmidt, representing the Excelsior Group, was in attendance and he provided price ranges <br /> of the homes and spoke about the positive economic impact to local builders. <br /> Council asked questions about the ponds, water reuse, street lighting, road easements, and the <br /> buffer on the west side of the pond. Juba clarified the buffer was City owned property and could <br /> be used for a future trail connection. <br /> Mayor Weidt invited the audience to comment. <br /> Bob Creager, 5214 141" Street North, said he was concerned about the lot sizes, water <br /> overflowing in the ditches, and an increase in taxes. <br /> Lisa Berger 5485 134th Street North, stated she was directly affected by the proposed pond, and <br /> asked to keep a large buffer because of standing water on their property when it rains. She was <br /> also concerned that water would flow into their property when they build the lots up. She talked <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.