My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017.07.17 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2017 CC Packets
>
2017.07.17 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2017 10:42:41 AM
Creation date
7/14/2017 10:33:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
7/17/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA <br />NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) <br />3. Detailed Notes on All Funds (Continued) <br />A. Deposits and Investments (continued) <br />Concentration of Credit Risk <br />The City places no limit on the amount the City may invest with any one issuer. Investments in <br />any one issuer that represented 5% or more of total investments as of December 31, 2016 were <br />as follows: <br />Issuer Investment Type Value <br />RBC Wealth Management Money Market Funds $ 19,061,732 <br />Custodial Credit Risk <br />For an investment, custodial credit risk is the risk that, in the event of the failure of the counter <br />party, the City will not be able to recover the value of its investment securities that are in the <br />possession of an outside party. At December 31, 2016 all investments were insured or registered <br />or the securities were held by the City or its agent in the City's name. <br />Fair Value Measurements <br />Fair value measurements are determined utilizing the framework established by the <br />Governmental Accounting Standards Board. The framework provides a fair value hierarchy that <br />prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives <br />the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities <br />(Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). <br />The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows: <br />Level 1: Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical <br />assets or liabilities in active markets that the City has the ability to access. <br />Level 2: Inputs to the valuation methodology include: <br />o Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets <br />o Quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets <br />o Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability <br />o Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market <br />data by correlation or other means. <br />If the asset or liability has a specific (contractual) term, Level 2 input must be <br />observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.