2017.08.21 CC Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

pubic ditch data with all public drainage authorities. This subset of the watercourses incorrectly mapped on the PWI maps as public ditches are hereinafter referred to as the "subject watercourses." 7. The subject watercourses had been depicted on the PWI maps with heavy dashed lines because it was believed, based on data available at the time of the development of the PWI, that they were part of public ditch systems and were also altered natural watercourses within the definition of "public waters" under applicable law. See Minn. Stat. § 105.38, subd. 14(i) (1980) recodified in Minn. Stat. § 103G.005, subd. 15(9) (2016). 8. The DNR's determination that the subject watercourses were public ditches was based on information then available from public drainage authorities and otherwise within DNR's records at the time of the creation of the PWI maps and lists. 9. The determination that the subject watercourses were altered natural watercourses within the definition of "public waters" under applicable law was based on the same criteria applied to other watercourses evaluated for inclusion in the PWI—i.e., defined bed and bank and drainage area greater than two square miles. See Minn. Stat. § 105.38, subd. 10 (1980) (defining "natural watercourse"), subd. 11 (1980) (defining "altered natural watercourse") and subd. 14(i) (1980) (including natural watercourse and altered natural watercourse with total drainage area in excess of two miles within statutory definition of "public waters"). 10. The legend on the PWI maps notes that "Watercourses are identified with a heavy, dark line" and that "Public Ditches are identified with a dashed line." Hence, the subject watercourses, being identified at the time as public ditches and altered natural watercourses were depicted on the PWI maps with heavy dashed lines. 11. The subject watercourses were included on the PWI maps developed in the inventory process, but were not included in the PWI lists created as part of that process. The subject watercourses, totaling approximately 640 miles, are located in 71 counties and are identified in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 12. Because the subject watercourses were not identified on the PWI lists, landowners did not necessarily know that these waters were, in fact, being designated as public waters. Accordingly, landowners affected by inclusion of the subject watercourses in the PWI did not have adequate notification regarding their opportunity to object or. request a hearing to dispute subject watercourses proposed inclusion in the PWI. See 1979 Minn. Laws, ch. 199 § 7. In addition, the preliminary PWI maps incorrectly identified these public waters as public ditches that would be regulated by public drainage authorities. 13. The subject watercourses were included in the final PWI maps, but were not included on the PWI lists when then -DNR Commissioner Joseph Alexander published the PWI lists for each county.