My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006.03.20 EDA Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
EDA
>
EDA Agenda/Packets
>
2006 EDA Packets
>
2006.03.20 EDA Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2017 1:16:45 PM
Creation date
8/24/2017 1:16:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
3/20/2006
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
EDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t <br /> Background Information on the Johnson/Bakk Bill <br /> (Not necessarily intended as talking points) <br /> • Municipal eminent domain activity in Minnesota does not warrant the restrictions <br /> listed in the Johnson/Bakk bill. <br /> • The principal anti-eminent domain bill (Rep Jeff Johnson/Sen Tom Bakk) includes <br /> the following: <br /> • A condemning authority must "show by clear and convincing evidence to the <br /> district court" that an eminent domain action is necessary for blight removal, <br /> contamination remediation, abandoned property removal or removal of a public <br /> nuisance. This unnecessarily high standard of review will be costly and will <br /> put our revitalization decisions in the hands of judges instead city councils <br /> and businesses. <br /> • Abandoned property is not occupied and the owner can't be identified and <br /> contacted <br /> • Blighted areas include dilapidated buildings that are "unfit for human use" — <br /> basically, buildings that are falling down or about to fall down <br /> • Environmentally contaminated area is a parcel where 50% of its surface or <br /> subsurface area contains contaminants — a standard that is impossible to <br /> determine at the early stages of a project and is not necessarily related to the <br /> cost of remediation <br /> • For blighted areas and contaminated areas, a condemning authority can only <br /> take the blighted or contaminated parcels. No unblighted or uncontaminated <br /> parcels may be condemned unless the taking is necessary to remove the <br /> blight or contamination <br /> • Public purpose for eminent domain do not include tax base increase, job <br /> creation or general community economic health <br /> • Seller's attorney's fees must be paid by the condemning authority if the final <br /> judgement exceeds a city's last written offer by 20% <br /> • In addition to value of the real estate, a condemning authority must also pay for <br /> a business "loss of going concern" if the business can't reestablish elsewhere. <br /> The burden of proof is with the city, not the business <br /> • The condemning authority is responsible to provide compensation that "at a <br /> minimum must be sufficient for an owner to purchase a similar house or building <br /> or equivalent size in the community" <br /> The bottom line is that this bill dramatically reduces when and where an eminent <br /> domain action may occur and also dramatically increases the cost of eminent <br /> domain actions. This bill will make redevelopment projects significantly harder to <br /> do, and will certainly contribute to an increase in blighted, deteriorated and <br /> contaminated properties in the Metro Area. <br /> Association of Metropolitan Municipalities and the League of Minnesota Cities <br /> 145 University Avenue West, St.Paul,MN 55103-2044 <br /> AMM: 651-215-4000 LMC: 651-281-1200 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.