My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006.03.20 EDA Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
EDA
>
EDA Agenda/Packets
>
2006 EDA Packets
>
2006.03.20 EDA Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2017 1:16:45 PM
Creation date
8/24/2017 1:16:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
3/20/2006
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
EDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Editonalsreprebu... .. _.. <br /> IJ/ They are researched and written by the Editorial Department, <br /> which is independent of the newsroom. <br /> StarTribune <br /> J.KEITH MOYER,President and Publisher <br /> ANDERS GYLLENHAAL,Editor SUSAN AI.BRIGHT,Editor,Editorial Pages <br /> f SCOTT GILLESPM,Managing Editor JIM BOYD,Deputy Editor,Editorial Pages <br /> _t <br /> Think before axing <br /> •sldu:)sn <br /> 'fT1J° gau <br /> weminent domain <br /> ill ssaJ sa1aaq isnu <br /> do jauq aq Plnoil' <br /> pagsggndaia Auu <br /> ;o.Cliadoid alp- • Curbing governments power would chill urban revival. <br /> PUL,slaiia'I-(awc <br /> auotld pue uotledn Before swallowing whole the Drawing a sharp line between <br /> -It11M D44 apnput I notion that government's power public purpose and private gain is <br /> sn oI aetsnpXZ)aq of eminent domain should be se- all but impossible.There's poten- <br /> verely restricted, Minnesota leg- tial for private gain in every pub- <br /> '6S£V-£L <br /> sgod,eauur ny islators should look soberly at the lic action.Critics don't complain <br /> re1S'Iuau4ieda potential consequences. about condemning property for <br /> IJIO <br /> asMua Q Do they really want to dissuade roads and other public projects. <br /> •uzoa•� <br /> OT TTw-a Aq suot, the revival of older communities; Yet roads spawn enormous pri- <br /> to further starve older tax bases vate benefit. Just look at what's <br /> -utdoarliiolsaJapie (and school systems); to further built beside them. It's especially <br /> uoiledotiiEda concentrate poverty, and to en- ironic that roadside auto dealers <br /> ZSMRIA HnC courage urban sprawl and its ex- should complain about govern- <br /> pensive byproducts—traffic con- ment's authority to, as a last re <br /> gestion, environmental degrada- sort,condemn one private proper- <br /> -- — tion,energy waste and higher in- ty for another.No corporate inter <br /> frastructure costs? est has gained more from eminent T Hi <br /> sgodeauutW,D11HuN3 If not, they should consider domain than the auto industry. Pa <br /> cooler, more balanced reforms Some reforms are needed,but <br /> olid um; ppioa A than those sought by a nation- proposed changes in the blight ' <br /> Iunoum aip tuo.13 1 wide libertarian blitz against last and environmental standards go nes <br /> IIp iisu'.Il uo Iu� year's Supreme Court ruling in the too far.The greatest danger isn't dal <br /> Cue luunn I,uop iia Connecticut property rights case, that urban development would ate <br /> watudolanaf Kelo vs. New London.Yes, some stop entirely,but that a developer <br /> sell an lasap Aagl an local governments have bullied who discovers one reluctant sell- to <br /> -gond zagio 3o Iso property owners into condemna er would simply decide that busi- na <br /> `uollsa2uoo azoul tion proceedings to advance pri- ness is easier on the metro fringe, tic <br /> uegmgns wow 1eq vate development projects. But where taxpayers will be left with pr <br /> .SAvMg2111 that's rare in Minnesota. The bi- the costs of redundant infrastruc- <br /> do g2noo of ams ail partisan bill offered at the behest ture and the consequences of ur- <br /> sgmgns Apaaz2 mo' of a Washington-based property- ban neglect. S <br /> rights group and Minnesota's auto These arguments may well fail, <br /> Sytlgns ai dealers'association uses a sledge- not because they are wrong but be- <br /> 0 N I a N fI3 N O I.L hammer to swat a fly. Property cause they are complex.The liber- a <br /> owners deserve fairer compen- tarian lobbies have both momen- p' <br /> epolauu.W•Q-JVNOQ, sation, and should get it. But re- tum and emotion on their side. si <br /> moving local government's last- They use fear to portray proper- e <br /> Sri uo puels a uaxe ditch tool for redevelopment goes ty owners as helpless victims of f <br /> Aanax wqi pnoid i too far. predatory governments eager to <br /> e Bons zap Auap of 1 Are the people of St.Louis Park condemn their homes solely to a <br /> better off because of the Excelsior reward rich developers. It's the c <br /> Sl IMP I13auaq algiss4 and Grand project?Have people in kind of demagoguery that works <br /> -ap ags pue 'Ajiuno: southwest Minneapolis benefited at election time. <br /> -oes aleuniln znp apes from 50th and France?Is Richfield If legislators are,however,truly <br /> '(SZ•qa3'aunqu I,_wl better off with a Best Buy head- interested in the public good,they <br /> Regaq no 2ui1g2g.Ic quarters than a car dealership? will carefully examine the pro <br /> •uaS pue zie7 uog•d Has the whole metro region bene- posed changes,consider the con <br /> fited?We think it has,even though sequences and find a fair balance <br /> �I SaA. these cities used eminent domain between the interests of private <br /> ava A14V I (or its leverage)in each case. property and community. <br /> n <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.