Laserfiche WebLink
Mar 31 Z006 18:80:05 Via Fax -> Administrator Page 801 Of 885 <br /> Lmc <br /> -Fred a a F x- <br /> A weekly legislative update from the League ofMinnesota Cities <br /> March 31, 2006 <br /> Pagel <br /> Joint powers liability bill up next The House companion bill, I-IF 3079 authored <br /> week by Rep. Ron Abrams(R-Minnetonka), has been <br /> approved by the House Local Government <br /> Next Tuesdav, the Senate Judiciary Committee Committee and the House Civil Law <br /> is scheduled to consider SF 2648, the Joint Committee and is now on the House floor. <br /> Powers Liability bill supported by the League <br /> Questions? Contact Gary Carlson 651-281- <br /> of Minnesota Cities. Tuesday is the second <br /> committee deadline and the bill must be 1255 or by email at_cEar!.Von di hnnc.c�rg. <br /> reported out of the Judiciary Committee or it <br /> will be dead for the session. Unfortunately, the Senate passes bill restricting eminent <br /> bill will likely be considered after the domain authority; House vote <br /> controversial constitutional amendment expected next week <br /> proposal to define marriage. <br /> On Mondav, the Minnesota Senate approved <br /> The bill clarifies the application of the state tort SF 2750, legislation restricting eminent domain <br /> caps to joint powers arrangements_ The bill, authority authored by Sen. Tom Bakk(DFL- <br /> which is authored by Sen. Ann Rest(DFL-New Cook) and supported by the Institute for Justice <br /> Hope), specifies that the tort caps apply as if a and the Minnesota Automobile Dealers <br /> joint powers entity or, arrangement is a separate Association. <br /> government entity, regardless of the number of <br /> participating local units of government. The Legislators offered several amendments to the <br /> legislation was introduced in response to an <br /> bill, including one proposed by Sen- Steve <br /> Eighth U.S. Circuit Court decision involving a <br /> Murphy(DFL-Red Wing) and supported by <br /> joint powers entity created by the Crookston local governments, which exempts strip takings <br /> School district and the city of Crookston. valued under$25,000 from the attorney fees <br /> provision in the bill. Another amendment <br /> The bill is jointly supported by the League of proposed by Sen- Julianne Ortman(R- <br /> Minnesota Cities, the Association of Minnesota Chanhassen)would have stricken the blight <br /> Counties, the Minnesota School Boards provisions in the bill and only allowed for the <br /> Association and the Minnesota Association of acquisition of private property to remove a <br /> Townships. public nuisance or environmental <br /> contamination. The Murphy amendment was <br /> In the Crookston case, a maintenance worker adopted while the C7tman amendment was <br /> was injured in a boiler mishap at a swimming defeated on a 33-33 vote. <br /> pool jointly run by the school and the city. <br /> Although the school district had assumed SF 2750 passed, as amended, on a 64-2 vote <br /> responsibility for any mishaps under the joint with Seri. Sandy Pappas (DFL-St. Paul) and <br /> powers arrangement, the court found that the T <br /> Sen- Wes Skoglund (DFL-Minneapolis) voting <br /> school and the city were each liable up to the against the bill. A summary of the major <br /> state tort caps of$300,000 per individual and components of the Senate bill was published in <br /> $1 million per event. this week's Cities'Bulletin. <br /> For more information on city legislative issues,contact any member of the League of Minnesota Cities Intergovernmental Relations team. <br /> 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 <br />