My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006.04.17 EDA Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
EDA
>
EDA Agenda/Packets
>
2006 EDA Packets
>
2006.04.17 EDA Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2017 1:21:06 PM
Creation date
8/24/2017 1:21:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
4/17/2006
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
EDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT C <br /> MINNESOTA COMMUNITIES WITH COMPETITIVE CABLE SERVICES <br /> 1. Albertville 15. Luverne 29. St. Charles <br /> 2. Baxter/Brainerd 16. Marshall 30. St. James <br /> 3. Becker 17. Melrose 31. St. Peter <br /> 4. Bemidji 18. Montrose 32. Slayton <br /> 5. Big Lake 19. Morris 33. Sleepy Eye <br /> 6. Caledonia 20. Nashwauk 34. Springfield <br /> 7. Chokio 21. New Prague 35. Staples <br /> 8. Fergus Falls 22. New Ulm 36. Tracy <br /> 9. Goodview 23. Otsego 37. Wabasha <br /> 10. Grand Rapids 24. Paynesville 38. Wadena <br /> 11. Hugo 25. Park Rapids 39. Waseca <br /> 12. Keewatin 26. Pipestone 40. Willmar <br /> 13. Litchfield 27. Redwood Falls 41. Winona <br /> 14. Little Falls 28. Rosemount 42. Worthington <br /> 43. Zimmerman <br /> 5 There are currently at least 43 communities in Minnesota with two or more competitive providers. In late 2005 six <br /> LFAs approved the transfer of their competitive franchises to the incumbent cable operator. <br /> C-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.