Laserfiche WebLink
Pagel of 2 <br /> Mike Ericson <br /> From: Carolyn Krall [ckrall@landformmsp.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 5:02 PM <br /> To: Bryan Bear <br /> Cc: Mike Ericson; Kendra Lindahl <br /> Subject: FW:Attached Image <br /> Bryan; <br /> attached is the revised lower quadrant(southwest corner of CR 8 and Hwy 61)of the downtown plan (not <br /> rendered yet). Before I finish it I'd like to confirm that this is roughly what you were looking for. <br /> I added more office commercial space, as requested --but some comments I heard wanted only commercial <br /> space, others wanted a mix with office and multi-family. So I studied it further and developed this plan, working <br /> with the following parameters and assumptions: <br /> 1. access is limited to a single point at the northwest end of the site, where we can get to the new intersection <br /> on CR 8; there is no access to Hwy 61; <br /> 2. we only have 5-600 ft of stacking room at the CR 8 intersection, so the amount of traffic created by <br /> commercial space is a concern -- large amounts of retail space aren't workable; <br /> 3. multi-story buildings are desirable downtown, but the additional height and area creates the need for larger <br /> parking lots; so this plan mixes 2 story and 1 story buildings to achieve a balance,- <br /> 4. <br /> alance;4. the plan provides 50,000 sf of commercial area, which seems in the reasonable range, if more commercial <br /> area was provided (maybe along CR 8 ?)you would begin to need the entire interior of the site for parking <br /> and a pond, which seems at odds with the desire to avoid large parking lots; <br /> 5. so keeping some housing here seemed to make sense, but it needs to be enough to be worth a builder <br /> pursuing, and enough to function as a small neighborhood --so generally not less than 40-50 units,- <br /> 6. <br /> nits;6. town homes seem to be more marketable in this area than condos, and on-street parking works for their <br /> guest parking (with resident parking fully enclosed), reducing run-off, increasing green space and allowing <br /> for localized pending; <br /> 7. If rental apartments were an option (senior or otherwise)you could build one larger building with about 100 <br /> units on the same or less land, but with more parking surface needed, although some of that parking might <br /> be able to be shared with the commercial uses <br /> Let me know what you think-- I tried several options, and on past plans we had sketched several others. This <br /> plan seemed to be a good balance--and of course interested developers will come back with their own ideas, <br /> which will be different too. <br /> If it looks reasonable we will get the rendering done and get it pasted into the original plan. <br /> Thanks for you help, <br /> Carolyn Krall,A.I.A. <br /> Principal <br /> 510 First Avenue North, Suite 650 <br /> Minneapolis, MN 55403 <br /> Office: 612.252.9070 <br /> Direct: 612.638.0253 <br /> Fax: 612.252.9077 <br /> 5/4/06 <br />