My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006.07.17 EDA Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
EDA
>
EDA Agenda/Packets
>
2006 EDA Packets
>
2006.07.17 EDA Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2017 1:27:38 PM
Creation date
8/24/2017 1:27:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
7/17/2006
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
EDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tax Abatement aka. "TIF-Lite" <br /> Tax Abatement operates under a similar concept as TIF, is less complex, but is <br /> limited in its financial contribution. Abatement operates under the same concept of TIF <br /> in the fact that it captures revenue that is generated by development, and other properties <br /> located in the "abatement district." Simply put the City defines a geographic region <br /> whose tax revenue is going to be captured to provide financial assistance to a project. <br /> The reason Tax Abatement generates a lesser amount of money is two-fold. First, <br /> only the City's portion of the revenue can be captured, as opposed to city, county, and <br /> school portion that TIF provides. Secondly, Cities are limited by MN State Statutes in <br /> the fact that they can only capture $200,000 or 10% of the Cities tax levy whichever is <br /> greater. Therefore any funding which tax abatement is used for is inherently going to be <br /> of a lesser amount than TIF would provide. <br /> The benefits of abatement arise from its relative simplicity in comparison to TIF. <br /> It is not as highly regulated as TIF, and does not have to meet the criteria that usually <br /> accompany a TIF project. Tax Abatement provides cities with an option that still allows <br /> for a substantial amount of funding to be provided to a project, without the complexity of <br /> TIF. <br /> Financial Assistance Conclusions <br /> All of the above mentioned tools are presented in terms of the theory of their use. <br /> The implementation of any of these tools has to be on the basis strong public policy that <br /> regulates their use. It is essential that anytime a City or EDA uses public funds to <br /> provide assistance to private industry, it has to be done for the right reasons, which is <br /> why the policy is so important. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.