Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> Focus On New Laws <br /> Eminent domain <br /> Laura Harris <br /> The power of eminent domain has These terms are defined as follows: ings and non-contaminated parcels <br /> been under scrutiny since the U.S. Blighted area. Section 2,subd.6 unless there is"no feasible alternative" <br /> Supreme Court rendered its deci- requires that the area be in urban in order to remediate blight or con- <br /> sion in Kelo v.City of New London last use and that 50 percent of the tamination in the area and all possible <br /> summer.While this decision did not buildings in the area are structur- steps are taken to minimize the taking <br /> expand local government eminent ally substandard.Section 2,subd. of non-structurally substandard build- <br /> domain powers,it raised awareness and 7 defines"structurally substan- ings or non-contaminated parcels. <br /> sparked a vigorous public debate about dard"as a building:1)that has been Finally,section 8 of the new law <br /> the use of eminent dom ain,particu- inspected and cited for enforceable provides that takings to mitigate a <br /> larly for economic development and housing,maintenance,or build- blighted area,remediate an environ- <br /> redevelopment purposes.In its deci- ing code violations;2)in which the mentally contaminated area,reduce <br /> sion,the court invited states to scru- building code violations involve abandoned property,or remove a pub- <br /> tinize their eminent domain laws,and specific structural aspects of the lic nuisance require a preponderance <br /> state legislatures across the country building;3)in which cited viola- of evidence showing if challenged in <br /> responded with legislation to restrict tions have not been remedied after court.A court order approving the <br /> the use of this tool. two notices to cure noncompliance; public purpose,necessity,and author- <br /> In the 2006 session,the Minne- and 4)where the cost to cure the ity for a taking is final unless an appeal <br /> sota Legislature enacted a new law violations is more than 50 percent is brought within 60 days. <br /> that severely restricts the use of emi- of the assessor's taxable market value <br /> nent domain for economic develop- for the building. New compensation requirements <br /> ment and redevelopment purposes Environmentally contaminated area. Minnesota's new eminent domain <br /> and provides greater compensation to Section 2,subd.8 defines"environ- law contains several provisions that <br /> property owners in all condemna tion mentally contaminated area"as an will increase the cost of all eminent <br /> proceedings.The bill was signed into area where more than 50 percent of domain proceedings,including those <br /> law(MN Session Laws 2006,Chapter the parcels contain contamination for traditional public uses,such as <br /> 214)on May 19,2006.The key provi- and the estimated costs of clean-up roads and parks. <br /> sions of the new law are summarized are more than the assessor's esti- These new provisions include the <br /> below mated market value of the parcel. following: <br /> • Abandoned property. Section 2, • Payment of attorney fees. Section 4 <br /> Limits on eminent domain authority subd.5 defines"abandoned prop- provides that the court may award <br /> Under this new law,the purposes for erty"as property that has been reasonable attorney fees and costs if <br /> which eminent domain may be used unoccupied or unused for at least the final award is between 20 percent <br /> are narrowly defined.The public one year;that has not been main- and 40 percent greater than the <br /> benefits of economic development, tained;and for which taxes have not last written offer made by the con- <br /> including an increase in tax base,tax been paid for at least the previous demning authority before filing a <br /> revenues,employment or general eco- two years. condemnation petition.If the award <br /> nomic health are not by themselves • Public nuisance. Section 2,subd.9 is more than 40 percent greater <br /> considered a public use or public pur- refers to Minnesota Statutes 609.74 than the last written offer,then the <br /> pose.However,in limited circum- as the definition of"public nui- court must award a property owner <br /> stances the use of emi nent domain to sance"for eminent domain pur- his or her attorney fees.This sec- <br /> mitigate a blighted area,remediate an poses. tion prohibits an award of attorney <br /> environmentally contaminated area, The new law also limits the ability fees if the final judgment or award <br /> reduce abandoned property,or remove of local governments to assemble prop- is less than$25,000.It also specifies <br /> a public nuisance constitutes a public erty for redevelopment purposes.In that,for the purposes of determin- <br /> purpose. particular,section 3 prohibits the taking <br /> of non-structurally substandard build- <br /> Continued on page 8 <br /> August 9,2006 LMC Cities Bulletin Page 5 <br />