My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007.02.20 EDA Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
EDA
>
EDA Agenda/Packets
>
2007 EDA Packets
>
2007.02.20 EDA Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2017 1:45:37 PM
Creation date
8/24/2017 1:45:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
2/20/2007
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
EDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Hugo, Minnesota <br /> Section U Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements-Four Year Rule <br /> If after four years from certification of the TIF District no demolition, rehabilitation, renovation, or qualified <br /> improvement of an adjacent street has commenced on a parcel located within the TIF District, then that parcel shall <br /> be excluded from the TIF District and the original net tax capacity shall be adjusted accordingly. Qualified <br /> improvements of a street are limited to construction or opening of a new street, relocation of a street, or substantial <br /> reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing street. The City must submit to the County Auditor, by February 1 of the <br /> fifth year, evidence that the required activity has taken place for each parcel in the TIF District. <br /> If a parcel is excluded from the TIF District and the City or owner of the parcel subsequently commences any of the <br /> above activities, the City shall certify to the County Auditor that such activity has commenced and the parcel shall <br /> once again be included in the TIF District. The County Auditor shall certify the net.tax capacity of the parcel, as most <br /> recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue, and add such amount to the original net tax capacity of the TIF <br /> District. <br /> Section V Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions <br /> Exhibit V shows the estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions if the maximum projected retained captured net tax <br /> capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to the other taxing jurisdictions. The City believes that there <br /> will be no adverse impact on other taxing jurisdictions during the life of the TIF District, since the proposed <br /> development would not have occurred without the establishment of the TIF District and the provision of public <br /> assistance. A positive impact on other taxing jurisdictions will occur when the TIF District is decertified and the <br /> development therein becomes part of the general tax base. <br /> The fiscal and economic implications of the proposed tax increment financing district, as pursuant to Minnesota <br /> Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 2,are listed below. <br /> 1. The total amount of tax increment that will be generated over the life of the district is estimated to be <br /> $43,936,950. <br /> 2. To the extent the project in TIF District 1,-2 generates any public cost impacts on city-provided services such <br /> as police and.fire protection, public infrastructure, and the impact of any general obligation tax increment <br /> bonds attribute to the district upon the ability to issue other debt for general fund purposes, such costs will <br /> be levied upon the taxable net tax capacity of the City, excluding that portion captured by the District. <br /> 3. The amount of tax increments over the life of the district that would be attributable to school district levies, <br /> assuming the school district's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is <br /> estimated to be$9,387,794. <br /> 4. The amount,of tax increments over the life of the district that would be attributable to county levies, <br /> assuming the,county's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same is <br /> estimated to be$13,581,090. <br /> 5. No additional information has been requested by the county or school district that would enable it to <br /> determine additional costs that will accrue to it due to the development proposed for the district. <br /> Section W Prior Planned Improvements <br /> Various permits have been issued for a property within the TIF District within the last 18 months and are listed below: <br /> PID Address Date Issued Valuation Permit# <br /> 2003121240065 5582146th St N 9111/2006 2,000.00 2006-01730 <br /> SPRINGSTED Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.