Laserfiche WebLink
City of Hugo, Minnesota <br /> Additional inspections have occurred on the remaining buildings in the proposed TIF district in 2006. See Exhibit VII. <br /> The City anticipates using tax increment to reimburse itself for a portion of the eligible public improvement costs <br /> including acquisition,demolition,site improvements, and related administrative costs. <br /> The size of the proposed District makes it difficult to estimate with any certainty the years that various types of <br /> development will occur within such District. It is likely that multiple projects will occur through many years of the <br /> district. The projects forecasted within the Maxfield study are expected to be fully constructed through 2015. <br /> Although the City has been approached by several developers indicating some level of interest in redevelopment of <br /> specific parcels within the District, at the time this document was prepared there were no signed construction <br /> contracts with regard to the above described development. <br /> Section J Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing <br /> In establishing the TIF District,the City makes the following findings: <br /> (1) The TIF District qualifies as a redevelopment district-, <br /> The City of Hugo retained the services of three experienced City building officials to <br /> inspect and evaluate property within the proposed Tax Increment Financing District No 1-2 <br /> to be established by the City. The purpose of°the evaluations was to determine if the <br /> proposed district met the statutory requirements for coverage and if the buildings met the <br /> qualifications required for a,Redevelopment District. <br /> The final report has been, prepared by the officials for the City to retain on file in City <br /> offices for,public inspection. The,report'cantains the details of the findings summarized <br /> below:regarding the substandard gtralifications: <br /> • parcels consisting of 79.36 percent of the area of the proposed TIF District are <br /> occupied,exceeding the 70 percent coverage test; <br /> • 59.3$'percont„of the buildings in the proposed District contain code deficiencies <br /> exceeding the 15 percent threshold; <br /> • at least 59.38 percent of the buildings are structurally substandard to a degree <br /> requiring substantial renovation or clearance, because of defects in structural <br /> elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light <br /> and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of <br /> interior partitions, or similar factors which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient <br /> total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance, exceeding the <br /> more than 50 percent substandard test; and <br /> • the substandard buildings are reasonably distributed throughout the geographic <br /> area of the proposed TIF District. <br /> These findings are described more completely in Exhibit VII. <br /> (2) The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur <br /> solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and the increased <br /> market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax <br /> increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the <br /> proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the <br /> maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan. <br /> Factual basis: <br /> Proposed development not expected to occur.- <br /> SPRINGSTED Page 5 <br />