My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008.06.16 EDA Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
EDA
>
EDA Agenda/Packets
>
2008 EDA Packets
>
2008.06.16 EDA Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2017 10:17:54 AM
Creation date
9/1/2017 10:17:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
6/16/2008
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
EDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-----Original Message----- <br /> From: Paul Steinman [mailto:psteinman@springsted.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 4:54 PM <br /> To: Bryan Bear <br /> Cc: Mikaela Huot; Ron Otkin; Rachel; Ippel, Mary <br /> Subject: RE: Hugo Downtown Redevelopment TIF District <br /> Here are our choices as it currently sits, with Frenchman Centre sort of out there in the <br /> background. <br /> 1) certify before June 30, 08. First possible receipt of increment in 09 <br /> 2) certify after June 30, 08. First possible receipt of increment in 10 (which would <br /> include the first increment associated with Frenchman Centre if they build it in 08) <br /> 3) modify the TIF Plan to identify the specific year (if after 2010) in which we want to <br /> start receiving increment. The problem with this is, we are still guessing at the year we <br /> want first increment. <br /> In order to narrow these choices down I need to know the date of first demolition of the <br /> building which the council found substandard. (Rachel - can you identify this date?) <br /> Here is what we generally struggle with on these issues. Each year that passes, the <br /> value of the properties in the district generally rise (although maybe that's not the case <br /> currently). Remember that the base value will be set at the time of certification, <br /> therefore, the more the values rise in the district, the higher the base value will be. (High <br /> base value bad, low base value good) To complicate that is the fact that the base value <br /> includes the value of the parcels with the demolished buildings PRIOR to the <br /> demolition. <br /> Want more complication? What could happen because of all the demolition of buildings <br /> that has occurred and the possible stagnation in values now as an effect of the general <br /> housing market, is that Frenchman Centre could get built and assessed at the assumed <br /> value, and very little increment flows into the district. An example to illustrate this point <br /> would be assume our base value is $100, then demolition occurred which removed $25 <br /> of value. At that point the first $25 of new value created does not generate any <br /> increment, it only gets us back to the base value. Then as value is created over and <br /> above the base value, increment will be generated. <br /> We are trying to balance all of this entirely to avoid getting a TIF check from the County <br /> for some nominal amount of tax increment because that year is then counted as our first <br /> year of increment meaning we only have 25 remaining. Ideally we want our first year of <br /> increment to have the largest impact possible. <br /> Paul T. Steinman <br /> Vice President/Consultant <br /> Springsted Incorporated <br /> 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300 <br /> St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-2887 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.