Laserfiche WebLink
City of Hugo, Minnesota <br /> May 14, 2009 <br /> Page 2 <br /> *the Developer has indicated that the Bank will increase the amount of its loan by approximately 66% of the face <br /> amount of the PayGO Note in return for a pledge of the note. The result would be an increase in the loan and <br /> decrease in other funds—SBA 504. <br /> Follow-up discussions with the bank have indicated that the anticipated financing terms for the loan may be up to <br /> 90%of the project costs through the SBA program, with 10%private equity. The bank has indicated that the TIF <br /> Note will provide additional collateral and cash flow for the project, making a more favorable project to finance. <br /> But-For Analysis <br /> The"but-for"test is used to determine whether or not a project would proceed as proposed without the use of the TIF <br /> assistance. To complete this analysis we examined a 10-year operating pro forma of the project and compared the <br /> cash flows with and without assistance. The TIF assistance would be provided on a pay-as-you-go basis and would <br /> not be available during construction. For our side-by-side analysis of the project with and without TIF,we used <br /> identical financing assumptions for the construction financing. In the pro forma with TIF,we assume the annual <br /> increment revenues would be available to assist with operating and debt service expenses. Without TIF,the project <br /> would not have the additional revenues, resulting in annual cash flow shortfalls. <br /> The developer has indicated that TIF assistance is necessary to finance a portion of the redevelopment costs <br /> associated with the site through pay-as-you-go financing. In addition,it has been represented to us that the TIF <br /> financing will assist the developer in obtaining the private financing necessary to commence redevelopment and <br /> subsequent construction on the project. The developer anticipates using private financing to complete <br /> redevelopment and construction of the project,and using TIF to finance a portion of the annual expenditures <br /> associated with continued operations of the business, including debt service. <br /> Based on the increased cost of demolition and site preparation costs for the redevelopment site,it can reasonably be <br /> assumed that redevelopment on the site would not likely occur, but-for the assistance provided through Tax <br /> Increment Financing. Tax increment assistance may be necessary to encourage redevelopment of the site,with <br /> assistance used primarily to fund extraordinary redevelopment and demolition costs. <br /> Total Tax Increment Generated <br /> We are providing a tax increment revenue scenario using certain assumptions based on information for the proposed <br /> redevelopment as provided by the City and developer. The assumptions are as follows: <br /> • Total EMV of$2.OM(Land and Building) <br /> o Approximately$250/square foot <br /> • Base value of$758,700(existing Land and Building) <br /> o ONTC based on completed development <br /> • Class Rates Remain constant <br /> o Commercial-industrial(1.5%first$150,000, 2%thereafter) <br /> • Construction schedule <br />