My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013.12.10 EDA Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
EDA
>
EDA Agenda/Packets
>
2013 EDA Packets
>
2013.12.10 EDA Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2017 1:21:42 PM
Creation date
9/7/2017 11:59:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
12/10/2013
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
EDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND EDA MEETING <br /> TUESDAY,NOVEMBER 12,2013 <br /> 5 P.M. <br /> HUGO CITY HALL—ONEKA ROOM <br /> Mayor Weidt called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. <br /> COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Weidt, Council Members Bronk, Haas, Klein, Petryk <br /> CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Administrator Bryan Bear, Planner Rachel Juba, Community <br /> Development Intern Eric Maass <br /> EDA Present: Arcand, Denaway, Gallivan, Klein, Puleo, Weidt <br /> Washington County Commissioner Fran Miron gave an introduction regarding the potential for <br /> Economic Development within Washington County. He then turned the meeting over to David <br /> Unmacht of Springsted Incorporated who provided an outline of the process currently being <br /> taken by Springstead regarding data collection/analysis and community input as they pertain to <br /> the current study being conducted. <br /> Council Member Petryk described the importance that is placed on transit and infrastructure in <br /> regards to current and future economic development, and the ways Hugo is currently lacking in <br /> those regards potentially hindering economic development in the city. This notion was agreed <br /> upon by EDA member Puleo who stated that an interchange at 35E and County Road 4 could <br /> prove critical for economic development along that corridor. <br /> Bill Barrett, a local business owner, stated that additional city or county incentives could aid in <br /> business retention and growth, further spurring economic development. Council Member Klein <br /> stated that to further help local business owners there needed to be added competition between <br /> urban services, specifically high speed internet availability. <br /> Council Member Petryk discussed the potential for a small business bureau which would aid <br /> small businesses in locating property for sale, connecting businesses to potential employees, or <br /> possibly providing placement aid for technical training internships. These notions were echoed <br /> by Council Member Haas and Council Member Klein stating the potential creation of a small <br /> business incubator and extension of the accomplishments already created by local chambers of <br /> commerce. <br /> EDA Member Denaway described the importance of integrating the potential for increased <br /> economic development into the ranking and scheduling of transit projects. Denaway also <br /> described how important it was that the county continues to be flexible with traditional TIF rules <br /> to aid in economic development. Bryan Bear agreed with that notion, adding that it was also <br /> important that TIF and tax abatement are allowed to be used at the same time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.