My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005.05.16 EDA Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
EDA
>
EDA Agenda/Packets
>
2005 EDA Packets
>
2005.05.16 EDA Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2017 11:48:35 AM
Creation date
9/8/2017 11:48:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
5/16/2005
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
EDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Next Steps — Resources <br /> • Is redevelopment likely to require some form of public <br /> participation? <br /> — Acquisition, demolition, relocation <br /> • Redevelop substandard buildings <br /> — Infrastructure improvements <br /> • Street, storm sewer, signalization <br /> • Tax Increment Financing/Tax Abatement <br /> — TIF Redevelopment District <br /> — Create a source of funds <br /> A s Springsted <br /> Redevelopment District <br /> • Identification of District Boundaries <br /> • Qualifications <br /> — Improved parcels make up at least 70%of the district. To be <br /> considered improved,at least 15%of the parcel's area must <br /> contain improvements. <br /> — More than 50%of the buildings(excluding outbuildings)are <br /> structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial <br /> renovation or clearance. <br /> — A building is not considered substandard ff it could be brought up <br /> to code at a cost of less than 15%of a comparable new building <br /> on that parcel. <br /> Sesta •a-. 7 Springsted <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.