My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017.09.05 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2017 CC Packets
>
2017.09.05 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2017 10:04:56 AM
Creation date
9/13/2017 9:56:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
9/5/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
H-1 <br />NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: <br />1. The Court declares that the DNR's current and planned permitting of high <br />capacity groundwater appropriations and management of White Bear Lake and the Prairie <br />du Chien -Jordan Aquifer violate: <br />A. MERA, by impairing both White Bear Lake and the Prairie du Chien <br />Aquifer. <br />B. The Public Trust Doctrine, by: <br />1) Causing a continuing decline in the levels of both the Prairie du <br />Chien Jordan Aquifer and of White Bear Lake that diminishes the <br />size of the lake and its lakebed, and adversely impacts public uses <br />of the lake; and <br />2) Failing to take remedial measures within its authority to protect <br />White Bear Lake and the Prairie du Chien Aquifer, when it had <br />knowledge that its actions in issuing and failing to manage high <br />capacity groundwater pumping permits were adversely affecting <br />the lake and aquifer. <br />2. The Court declares that by virtue of its violating the following statutes and rules, <br />the DNR has violated MERA: <br />A. M.S. § 103G.211 (the draining of the lake resulting from the excessive <br />pumping of the aquifer); <br />B) M.S. § 103G. 287, subd. 5 (issuance of permits for pumping without a <br />determination that the amount of use is sustainable, particularly for future <br />generations); <br />C) M.S. § 103G.287 and .285 (failing to set collective annual withdrawal <br />limits from the lake; failing to require permittees to submit contingency plans for <br />alternate water sources; failing to set a meaningful trigger for implementation of <br />136 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.