Laserfiche WebLink
RETENTION OF OFFICIAL RECORDS <br />Position: <br />Washington County supports the current law that requires the county to retain official records. The county <br />does not support additional requirements to retain items that are not official documents or that are not <br />required as part of the data practices law, including the proposal to keep all email correspondence for a <br />period of three years. Washington County recommends any modifications to records retention or data <br />practices law be based on the content, not the media that contains the information. <br />Issue: <br />Under current law, counties and other local units of government are required to "make and preserve all <br />records necessary to a full and accurate knowledge of their official activities." Government records <br />include correspondence, memos, reports and other data or information regardless of its physical form or <br />characteristics. Laws are in place to define what is an official government record or document and for <br />how long that record must be retained. <br />Legislation was introduced in 2017 that would require all correspondence, whether it meets the definition <br />of being an official record or government record, to be retained for no less than three years. As noted in <br />the House Resource bill summary for House File #1185 this change would "significantly broaden the scope <br />of records retention laws and no longer provide for a distinction between official and unofficial records." <br />In early 2016, the metropolitan counties formed a workgroup to share information and develop best <br />practice recommendations on the management of electronic communications. That group recommended <br />a number of guiding principles for the management of electronic communications including: <br />• That retention should be applied based on the content of the electronic communication, not the <br />format; <br />• That electronic communication is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act; <br />• That electronic communication containing data that would be considered part of an official record <br />must be retained in accordance with established records retention schedules; and <br />• That the majority of electronic communications are not official records and are transitory in <br />nature. <br />The workgroup recommended that counties should have policies in place that address electronic <br />communications, that all for the efficient management of transient, nonofficial records, and adopt <br />technology solutions to support the movement and storage of electronic communications. <br />Support and Opposition: <br />There were a number of individuals and groups that supported the legislation to require a three-year <br />retention for all emails. Local units of government opposed the added requirements. <br />Previous Consideration: <br />The county Legislative Committee reviewed the 2017 legislation during the last legislative session. No <br />formal position has been taken by the county board. The county board sent a letter to its delegation on <br />February 14, 2017 outlining its concerns. The Minnesota Inter -County Association and Association of <br />Minnesota Counties actively opposed the bills in 2017. <br />29 <br />