My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018.02.05 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2018 CC Packets
>
2018.02.05 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2019 1:50:52 PM
Creation date
2/1/2018 2:52:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
2/5/2018
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
427
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. PROCEDURES <br />2.1 Boring Layout and Soil Sampling Procedures <br />The City of Hugo (City) requested we complete 19 soil borings along the proposed roadway. WSB <br />recommended the boring depths and selected the desired locations. Our survey crew staked the borings <br />by using GPS technology. The approximate boring locations are shown on the Soil Boring Exhibit in <br />Appendix A which is an aerial photo. The ground surface elevations at the borings were determined by <br />GPS with our surveying crew. <br />We drilled the borings on between December 8 and 11, 2017 with a truck -mounted CME -55 drill rig <br />operated by a two -person crew. The drill crew advanced the borings using continuous hollow stem <br />augers. Drilling methods, crew chief, depths, sampling interval, casing usage, groundwater observations, <br />test data, and other drilling information are indicated on the boring logs. Borings were extended beyond <br />the proposed 15 foot depths where unsuitable soils (organics, fills, etc) were encountered at planned <br />termination depths. <br />Generally, the drill crew sampled the soil in advance of the auger tip at two and one-half foot (2'/z') <br />intervals of a depth to fifteen feet (15') and then at five foot (5) intervals thereafter where necessary. The <br />soil samples were obtained using a split -barrel sampler which was driven into the ground during standard <br />penetration tests in accordance with ASTM D 1586, Standard Method of Penetration Test and Split -Barrel <br />Sampling of Soils. <br />The materials encountered were described on field logs and representative samples were containerized, <br />and transported to our laboratory for further examination and testing. <br />The samples were visually examined to estimate the distribution of grain sizes, plasticity, consistency, <br />moisture condition, color, presence of lenses and seams, and apparent geologic origin. We classified the <br />soils according to type using the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). A chart describing the <br />Unified Soil Classification System is included in Appendix A. <br />2.2 Groundwater Measurements and Borehole Abandonment <br />The drill crew observed the borings for free groundwater while drilling and after completion. These <br />observations and measurements are noted on the boring logs. The crew then backfilled the borings with <br />soil cuttings to comply with Minnesota Department of Health regulations. <br />2.3 Boring Log Procedures and Qualifications <br />The subsurface conditions encountered by the test borings are illustrated on the Logs of Test Borings in <br />Appendix A. Similar soils were grouped into the strata shown on the boring logs, and the appropriate <br />estimated USCS classification symbols were also added. The depths and thickness of the subsurface <br />strata indicated on the boring logs were estimated from the drilling results. <br />The transition between materials (horizontal and vertical) is approximate and is usually far more gradual <br />than shown. Information on actual subsurface conditions exists only at the specific locations indicated <br />and is relevant only to the time exploration was performed. Subsurface conditions and groundwater <br />levels at other locations may differ from conditions found at the indicated locations. The nature and <br />extent of these conditions would not become evident until exposed by construction excavation. These <br />stratification lines were used for our analytical purposes and, due to the aforementioned limitations, <br />should not be used as a basis of design or construction cost estimates. <br />Geotechnical Report <br />Oneka Lake Boulevard and Harrow Avenue Improvements <br />Hugo, Minnesota <br />WSB Project No. 010893-000 <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.