My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018.09.17 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2018 CC Packets
>
2018.09.17 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2020 3:01:06 PM
Creation date
9/14/2018 10:32:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
9/17/2018
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Agenda Number I.1 <br />CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT <br />DEPARTMENT <br />PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION <br />STAFF REPORT <br />TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator <br />FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director <br />SUBJECT: FastSun 4, LLC. Interim Use Permit for a Solar Farm located north of <br />165t' Street North and west of Henna Avenue North. <br />DATE: September 13, 2018 for the City Council Meeting of September 17, 2018 <br />ZONING: Future Urban Service (FUS) <br />LAND USE: Low Density Residential (LD) <br />REVIEW DEADLINE: The applicant has waived their right to the review period outlined in <br />State Statute number 15.99 <br />1. UPDATE ON PLANNING COMMISSION MEEINGS: <br />A. Planning Commission Meeting Thursday, July 26, 2018 <br />At its meeting on Thursday, July 26, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and <br />considered the applicants request. It was in staff s opinion that the applicant provided the items <br />requested by the Planning Commission. There were nine people that spoke during the public <br />hearing, including the applicants representative. <br />There were comments and concerns that were made from several of the residents. Following <br />describes the comments and concerns: <br />1. Concerns from a resident about wind ratings of the solar panels and them blowing on to <br />other properties during a severe storm event. <br />a. The applicant stated that the panels would be designed and installed per building <br />code requirements. <br />2. Concerns that the property would become a dumping ground and a suggestion of a gate at <br />the main entrance was stated. <br />a. The applicant stated that the plans would be revised to include a gate. <br />3. Statements were made that solar farm would depreciate the value of the surrounding <br />property. <br />a. The applicant stated that in another City they conducted a study that found that the <br />solar farm did not impact the surrounding property values, either up or down. <br />4. One resident stated they had concern about the wildlife in the area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.