Laserfiche WebLink
In the Matter of Amendments to Water <br />Appropriation Permit No. 1977-6229, <br />Saint Paul Regional Water Services <br />In the Matter of Amendments to Water <br />Appropriation Permit No. 1975-6207, <br />Stillwater Board of Water Commissioners <br />In the Matter of Amendments to Water <br />Appropriation Permit 1980-6153, <br />City of Vadnais Heights <br />In the Matter of Amendments to Water <br />Appropriation Permit No. 1969-0174, <br />City of White Bear Lake <br />In the Matter of Amendments to Water <br />Appropriation Permit Nos. 1984-6120 <br />and 1984-6121, Township of White Bear <br />In the Matter of Amendments to Water <br />Appropriation Permit No. 1989-6037, Whirlpool <br />Corporation and Reynolds Metals Company <br />OAH Docket No. 84-2002-35480 <br />OAH Docket No. 84-2002-35481 <br />OAH Docket No. 84-2002-35482 <br />OAH Docket No. 84-2002-35483 <br />OAH Docket No. 84-2002-35484 <br />OAH Docket No. 84-2002-3 5 5 5 9 <br />In the Matter of Amendments to Water OAH Docket No. 84-2002-35560 <br />Appropriation Permit No. 1986-6316, <br />Saputo Dairy Foods USA, LLC <br />IPROPOSED I ORDER STAYING THE PROCEEDINGS <br />IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, based on the stipulation of the parties and for good <br />cause shown, the above -entitled contested case hearings are stayed pending final judgment in <br />Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, et al. v. White Bear Lake Restoration Association, <br />No. A18-0750 (Minn. Ct. App.) and ensuing review by the Minnesota Supreme Court, if <br />applicable. This stay may be lifted prior to a final judgment by the Minnesota Court of Appeals <br />and, if applicable, the Minnesota Supreme Court upon a motion from any party establishing good <br />cause why the stay should be lifted before such final resolution. <br />2 <br />