My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC Packet 01.25.18
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2018 PC Packets
>
PC Packet 01.25.18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2018 10:38:22 AM
Creation date
12/6/2018 2:23:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
1/25/2018
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TGK Automotive, Sketch Plan <br />Page 4 <br />Staff has encouraged the applicant to evaluate cross access between the properties to the north <br />and south to limit the number access points onto Highway 61. Staff will continue to work with <br />the applicant on this as the project moves forward. <br />Architecture <br />The building is not simply a square and can provide some interest as the architecture comes <br />together. The applicant has provided elevations, renderings, and an example of what they <br />envision the building will look like. The applicant has stated the majority of the building material <br />would be brick. The entrance will be defined and the overhead doors do not dominate the <br />appearance of the building. Staff recommends the applicant further break up the large building <br />walls with additional architectural details and windows. The applicant will be required to meet <br />the commercial and industrial construction standards and design guidelines. The applicant has <br />some work to do in order to comply with the design guidelines. All roof top and ground mounted <br />mechanical equipment are required to be screened. All of these items will be worked through <br />with a formal site plan application submittal. <br />3. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: <br />The applicant has provided a sketch plan for the Planning Commission to review. The applicant <br />would like feedback on the site plan, architecture, and rezoning of the property. <br />There are details on the plan that have not been fully evaluated since this is a sketch plan <br />application. At the time a site plan application is submitted, they will be further evaluated with <br />additional information that will be required. It's in staff's opinion that the important question is <br />the rezoning of the property from NS to C-2. If the Planning Commission is comfortable with the <br />rezoning, they should discuss items that are important to the general layout and the how the <br />property is used in regards to the transitions between uses. <br />Attachments: <br />1. Location Map <br />2. Zoning Map <br />3. Engineers Memo dated January 19, 2018 <br />4. Sketch Plan <br />5. Renderings of Buildings <br />6. Example of Building Exterior <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.