My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
EDA Packet 09.18.18
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
EDA
>
EDA Agenda/Packets
>
2018 EDA Packets
>
EDA Packet 09.18.18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2018 3:29:21 PM
Creation date
12/7/2018 3:24:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
9/18/2018
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
EDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In summary: Package options for U of M Extension involvement ranges from <br />$15,000 for the premium program, $12,000 for the standard program and $7,000 <br />for the research option with no consulting included. This option is the most <br />comprehensive and will result in a more formal process and report. <br />2) City of Hugo and Washington County CDA lead program. <br />Under this option, City and CDA staff will develop and lead the program <br />including: developing a business survey, develop and oversee leadership teams, <br />coordinate the business visits, tabulate the survey data/responses and prepare a <br />report summarizing the results of the business surveys. This option is the least <br />expensive route (essentially using existing staff resources and in-house printing <br />and copying) but it could easily result in the most time consuming for staff. I am <br />a certified BR&E consultant through the U of M BR&E Program would welcome <br />the opportunity to assist/lead as the city desires at no additional expense to the <br />Hugo EDA. I have previously conducted five BR&E programs and I do have <br />sample documents including business surveys and letters to introduce the program <br />to the businesses that have successfully been used in other cities (and Chisago <br />County) to implement their programs. There would be no involvement of the U of <br />M Extension in this option. It is possible, however, to include the HBA and EDA <br />members as a partner in the business visits/surveys if you wish. Action items for <br />a future EDA work plan and priorities can be developed as a result of the <br />outcomes under this option. Summary results can also be shared (on the overall <br />findings of the survey) with the community and the businesses. <br />3) Hybrid of 1) and 2) above <br />It is possible that a combination of options 1) and 2) above could be implemented. <br />The benefits to a hybrid option may include: a more formal and public approach to <br />the program with increased visibility, a neutral party to summarize, tabulate and <br />report the survey data, and potentially less staff time. <br />The HBA, EDA and City and County CDA staff would conduct the business visits <br />and then the U of M could complete the research and report (identified above $7,000 <br />in the research option in 1). <br />4) Informal Meetings with the Mayor & staff. This option is likely going to be the <br />least time intensive and lowest cost approach. Business visits are usually <br />conducted with no formal surveys or report. Essentially this option provides a <br />way for the city to say "welcome" (to new businesses) and thank you for doing <br />business in Hugo. Q: Are there any concerns or topics that you want us to assist <br />you with"? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.