My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC Packet 03.23.17
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2017 PC Packets
>
PC Packet 03.23.17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2025 3:03:18 PM
Creation date
12/10/2018 8:30:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
3/23/2017
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
347
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Adelaide Landing Residential Development <br />Traffic Impact Analysis <br />Intersection Capacity Analysis <br />1/31/2017 <br />Traffic operations for the peak hour conditions within the study area were analyzed using <br />the industry -standard Synchro/Sim Traffic Version 9 software package, which uses the data <br />and methodology contained in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, published by the <br />Transportation Research Board. The software model was calibrated to replicate existing <br />conditions as accurately as possible before being used to assess future conditions. <br />The operating conditions of transportation facilities, such as traffic signals, stop -controlled <br />intersections and roundabouts, are evaluated based on the relationship of the theoretical <br />capacity of a facility to the actual traffic volumes on that facility. Various factors affect <br />capacity, including travel speed, roadway geometry, grade, number and width of travel <br />lanes, and intersection control. The current standards for evaluating capacity and operating <br />conditions are contained in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The procedures <br />describe operating conditions in terms of a Level of Service (LOS). Facilities are given letter <br />designations from A, representing the best operating conditions, to F, representing the <br />worst. Generally, Level of Service D (LOS-D) represents the threshold for acceptable overall <br />intersection operating conditions during a peak hour. <br />At intersections, Levels of Service are assigned differently for signalized or unsignalized <br />intersections (which include Two -Way Stop Control [TWSC], All -way Stop Control [AWSC] <br />and roundabouts). For signalized intersections, Level of Service is calculated by taking the <br />total Intersection Delay and converting it to a letter grade as shown in the right side of <br />Table 2. For an unsignalized intersection, Level of Service is calculated by taking the <br />Intersection Delay and converting it to a letter grade, as shown in the left side of Table 2. <br />While similar, the signalized control delay totals are higher than that of unsignalized <br />intersections. In any condition, when the LOS by Volume to Capacity Ratio exceeds 1.0, the <br />LOS is always F. <br />Under the 2010 HCM, common movements are included into lane groups. Control Delay is <br />then determined for each lane group and Levels of Service are based on this Control Delay. <br />For each lane group, Control Delay is quantified by number of seconds. Control Delay is <br />defined as the difference between the travel time that would have occurred in the absence <br />of the intersection control, and the travel time that results because of the presence of the <br />intersection control. Levels of Service are then based on the control delay per vehicle. <br />15 Westwood <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.