Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />March 23, 2017 <br />Page 6 <br />Lisa Berggren, 5485 134th Street, stated that there is a significant buffer of trees within the City owned outlot <br />that the Country Ponds neighborhood would like to keep as a buffer from the pond. <br />Bear stated that when the concept plan was commented on in 2016, the developer proposed using the City outlot <br />for stormwater ponding and park area. The City Commissions stated that they would be comfortable with a <br />proposal that used the City outlot for these purposes. Bear stated that this plan is still a proposal and has not <br />been approved yet. <br />Lisa Berggren, 5485 134th Street, stated she would like to see the plans change to keep the tree buffer between <br />the rear lot lines of the Country Ponds development and the pond. <br />Cory Meyer, project manager with Westwood Professional Services, approached the podium. He stated that <br />there is currently a 15 ft. buffer between the rear lot lines of Country Ponds and the pond and although trees are <br />proposed to be removed for the construction of the pond, trees were to be planted within that area to recoup that <br />buffer. Mr. Meyer stated if the Planning Commission recommended that the pond be pulled back and more of a <br />buffer given to those property owners, Westwood and the developer would work to accomplish that. <br />Bear stated that it would be helpful if the developer has an illustration showing the existing tree barrier being <br />discussed and which ones are proposed to be removed. <br />Larry Paist, 5465 134th Street approached the podium. He had concerns that the City was giving the developer <br />too much flexibility and also requested a larger buffer between the existing properties and the pond. <br />Lisa Berggren, 5485 134th Street, again stated she would like to see the plans change to keep the tree buffer <br />between the rear lot lines of the Country Ponds development and the pond. <br />Chair Kleissler closed the public hearing at 9:21 p.m. <br />Commissioner Rosenquist stated that traffic has been a major concern discussed. He believed that although <br />MnDot stated that no improvements to TH 61 were needed currently, the City should begin evaluating and <br />having conversations regarding the timing of those improvements. Rosenquist also stated that he believes the <br />developer should look at the buffer between the rear property lines and the pond and trying to keep the tree <br />buffer. <br />Commissioner Tjemlund requested that the developer explain what they are giving to the City that exceeds <br />standards in return for the PUD. <br />Commissioner McRoberts stated that he really likes the plan in regards to the ponding, arrangement of housing, <br />creative design, and water re -use. He voiced concerns about the higher density home product being located on <br />the corner of TH 61 and 130th Street. He also questioned if the developer was giving enough back to the City in <br />return for the PUD and use of the outlot. <br />Commissioner Knauss stated that it was her understanding that the villa product located on the corner of TH 61 <br />and 130th Street was generally geared towards empty nesters. She stated that the people purchasing those <br />homes generally won't be driving during peak periods. She described that she liked the development, especially <br />because it provides life cycle housing without having to leave a neighborhood. She stated that she had concerns <br />about the park showing a "tot lot" when a large, full size park should be required for this large development. <br />