My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC Packet 05.19.17
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2017 PC Packets
>
PC Packet 05.19.17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2018 11:39:42 AM
Creation date
12/10/2018 8:31:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
5/19/2017
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />March 23, 2017 <br />Page 3 <br />Commissioner Lessard suggested looking into the low profile units. <br />Commissioner Rosenquist agreed. <br />Mr. Shaw stated that he would be willing to look into the low profile units and if they can be seen, he would <br />propose to paint those units. <br />Commissioner McRoberts stated he agreed that low profile units should be installed and asked the applicant if <br />that is possible for this building. <br />Mr. Shaw stated he would have to look into it to ensure they would work for a building this size. <br />Commissioner Tjernlund asked the applicant if the largest unit would be air conditioning units. <br />Mr. Shaw stated yes. <br />Commissioner Tjernlund stated he has experience with those units and they are generally about 4 ft. tall and are <br />relatively large units. He believed it would be difficult, without knowing the makes and models, to ensure those <br />are screened from view. He stated that he is unsure, knowing how large those units would have to be for a <br />factory, if raising the parapet wall a couple of feet would screen the equipment from view. He stated that it was <br />his opinion, with the location of the building from the road and the surrounding properties, he would be willing <br />to be somewhat flexible on screening. <br />Juba stated that the resolution states that staff will continue to work with the applicant to ensure the rooftop <br />units are adequately screened. She stated she didn't believe the Planning Commission has to get into the details <br />of the units at this time. Juba described that she is relatively cautious of site distance illustrations because no <br />one knows what the height of the units will be and what is installed could be different. She stated that staff <br />would typically recommend raising the parapet height in order to screen the rooftop mechanical units, which <br />has more of a certainty that the units will be adequately screened. She stated that it was up to the Planning <br />Commission to recommend the applicant to raise the parapet or continue to work with staff on how the units <br />will be screened in the future. Juba stated she would not recommend painting the units to match the color of the <br />roof. She described that usually roof top equipment is painted a light grey to blend in better with the sky. <br />Chair Kleissler asked if the applicant has looked into raising the parapet. <br />Mr. Shaw stated they have looked into that, however, there is a substantial cost with doing so. <br />Commissioner McRoberts asked how much cost would be associated with raising the parapet out of the total <br />project cost. <br />Joe Alstatt, Western Spring Owner, approached the podium. He stated the cost is significant to them and they <br />are trying to make an investment into the community with the proposed building. He described this area as an <br />industrial area and stated he doesn't want the project to get caught up on screening of these units. <br />Commissioner Arcand stated that they have had projects in the past that have had minimal screening of the <br />rooftop mechanical units, so just want to ensure this project complies with the intent of the guidelines. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.