My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC Packet 09.14.17
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2017 PC Packets
>
PC Packet 09.14.17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2018 11:46:53 AM
Creation date
12/10/2018 8:34:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
9/14/2017
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lakeview Family Dental Variance <br />Page 3 <br />accommodating all landscaping on their own property, where currently, it encroaches <br />onto the MnDOT right -of way and the neighboring property to the south. <br />c. Character ofNeiahborhood. The variance, ifgranted, will not alter the essential <br />character of the neighborhood. <br />Existing businesses in this area were constructed prior to the City's current ordinance for <br />monument sign setbacks and building setbacks and therefore, do not meet setback <br />requirements within the City ordinance. In addition, the applicant's existing monument <br />sign is three feet from the south property line. The variance, if granted, would not alter <br />the character of the area. <br />It is in staff's opinion that there are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. <br />(3) Spirit and Intent. The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of this chapter and with the policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br />The requested variance is keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The intent of the <br />ordinance is to allow adequate spacing between adjacent properties and a permanent structure, like <br />a monument sign. The applicant's existing monument sign has been located three feet from the <br />south side property line since construction. The existing landscaping around the monument sign <br />encroaches onto the neighboring property and the MnDOT right-of-way. The new sign would <br />accommodate for all associated landscaping to be within the applicant's property. <br />It is the staff's opinion that the proposed side yard setback would be keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the ordinance. <br />(4) Prohibited Use. The variance, if granted, shall not have the effect of allowing any use <br />prohibited in the district. <br />Construction of a single tenant monument sign is permitted within the City. <br />(5) Hazard Consideration. The variance, if granted, shall not permit a lower degree of flood <br />protection than required by this chapter. The variance shall be determined the minimum <br />necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief, and the variance shall not be issued <br />within any designated regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood <br />discharge would result. <br />The proposed location of the monument sign is not located within a floodplain. <br />(6) Septic and Well Compliance. The sewage treatment system and water system of the subject <br />property is in compliance with city and state codes. <br />The property is served by municipal sewer and water. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.