My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC Packet 10.12.17
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2017 PC Packets
>
PC Packet 10.12.17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2018 11:49:44 AM
Creation date
12/10/2018 10:49:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
10/12/2017
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan <br />will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the <br />case with the use of other, more standard zoning districts. <br />The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 132 -acre site to create 251 residential home sites. <br />The R-3 zoning district requires a minimum lot width of 80 feet. The applicant is proposing a <br />combination of product types and lot widths listed below: <br />Product Type <br />Proposed Lot Width <br />Proposed No. of Lots <br />Single Family Homes <br />65 feet <br />136 <br />Villa Homes <br />55 feet <br />76 <br />Townhomes <br />30 feet <br />44 <br />The applicant is proposing the following setbacks: <br />Single Family and Villa Homes <br />Yard <br />R-3 Zoning District Minimum <br />Proposed Setbacks <br />Front <br />30 feet <br />25 feet <br />Side <br />10 feet <br />7.5 feet (15 feet total between homes) <br />Rear <br />30 feet <br />25 feet <br />It's unclear from the sketch plan and information provided by the applicant how the setbacks <br />would be applied to the townhomes. Further, it is hard to determine the setbacks because the <br />townhomes are usually surrounded by common open space. Staff will continue to work with the <br />applicant on the setbacks for the townhomes. However, staff does recommend at least 30 feet <br />between multi-level townhome buildings. This is consistent with other townhome projects in <br />Hugo. <br />The maximum development density for a PUD in the R-3 zoning district is 4 units per 1 acre. <br />The applicant is proposing a residential net density of 3 units per 1 acre, which fits the <br />requirements of a PUD. Although the applicant is requesting flexibility on lot sizes and <br />setbacks, the density meets the ordinance standards. <br />The shoreland district comes in effect for all homes located within 1000 feet of the ordinary <br />high-water (OHW) level of Oneka Lake. Oneka Lake is classified as a natural environment lake. <br />The City's shoreland overlay district ordinance requires 20,000 square foot minimum lot size, <br />125 -foot minimum lot width, maximum 25 -foot building height, and maximum 25 percent <br />impervious surface coverage for non -riparian lots. The proposed lots do not meet the <br />requirements, but flexibility may be allowed with a PUD. The DNR PUD standards also apply to <br />this development and the applicant will be required to demonstrate they have satisfied the <br />requirements. It should be noted that all of the lots shown on the sketch plan are non -riparian lots <br />as the applicant has retained public open space and a trail adjacent to the lake. <br />Detailed review of any flexibility would be required as part of the PUD General Plan review. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.