Laserfiche WebLink
STATE FUNDING FOR SAFETY NET SERVICES <br />Position: <br />Washington County supports ensuring adequate state funding for essential health and human service <br />safety net programs without shifts in funding from the state budget to the county property taxpayers. <br />Issue: <br />Year after year the Minnesota Legislature balances the State budget by shifting safety net costs to <br />counties. In recent years those shifts have come in the form of increases to the county share of residential <br />costs at state -run safety net institutions. Often these shifts are a product of conference committee <br />negotiations that do not allow for information to be shared with legislators on the impact of these shifts. <br />These shifts also often include costs that the county has limited or no ability to manage, and that places <br />increasing pressure on the property tax to fund state services that are more appropriately paid for with <br />less regressive state funding sources like the income and sales tax. <br />Support and Opposition: <br />Minnesota Counties are united in their opposition to these ongoing cost shifts. The Minnesota Association <br />of County Social Service Administrators, Minnesota Inter -County Association, and the Association of <br />Minnesota Counties support the position. Human service advocacy organizations that are focused on <br />getting their legislative positions included in final legislation are often not concerned about who is paying <br />the bill and the regressive nature of the property tax system. <br />Previous Consideration: <br />The issue has been indirectly referenced in the county position on taxpayer protection. It does parallel a <br />long-standing county position opposing maintenance of effort requirements. Counties have not had <br />success eliminating those over the years, despite very compelling arguments that they are an antiquated <br />means of funding important core services that seriously interfere with innovation and good practice. <br />No Action: <br />Counties will be forced to continue to raise property taxes which are not predicated on people's ability to <br />pay in order to pay for services that should be funded by less regressive state funding sources. <br />Financial Implications: <br />County Human Services Cost Shares: <br />• Minnesota Security Hospital, St. Peter <br />o Counties responsible for ten percent of the daily cost <br />o Counties responsible for 50 percent of the cost for the Transitional Program <br />• Forensic Nursing Home, St. Peter <br />o Counties responsible for 10 percent of the daily cost <br />o Counties responsible for 50 percent of cost when the individual no longer requires <br />program (note: counties have no say as to when this decision occurs, nor are there <br />suitable community options available) <br />• Community Behavioral Health Homes (CBHH) <br />o Counties responsible for 100 percent of cost for individuals who are determined by the <br />State to no longer meet medical criteria for placement <br />25 <br />