My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019.01.23 CC Packet - Goal Setting Session
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2019 CC Packets
>
2019.01.23 CC Packet - Goal Setting Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2020 2:36:09 PM
Creation date
1/23/2019 1:18:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
1/22/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Housing & Economic Development <br />proposals, using established criteria, and make recommendations to the legislature on their <br />passage; <br />• Encourage the State Auditor to continue to work toward a more efficient and <br />streamlined reporting process. There are an increasing number of noncompliance notices <br />that have overturned longstanding practices or limited statutorily defined terms. The <br />Legislature has not granted TIF rulemaking authority to the State Auditor and the audit <br />powers granted by statute are not an appropriate vehicle for making administrative or <br />legislative changes to TIF statutes. If the State Auditor is to exercise rulemaking authority, <br />the administrative power to do so must be granted explicitly by the Legislature. The audit <br />enforcement process does not create a level playing field for cities to challenge the <br />Auditor's interpretation of statutes. The Legislature should provide a process through <br />which to resolve disputes over TIF policy that is fair to all parties; <br />Clarify the use of TIF when a sale occurs after the closing of a district; <br />• Revise the substandard building test to simplify, resolve ambiguities and reduce <br />continued threat of litigation; and <br />• Amend TIF statutes to address, through extending districts or other mechanisms, <br />shortfalls related to declining market values during economic crises. <br />3-M Eminent Domain <br />Significant statutory restrictions on the use of eminent domain have resulted in higher public <br />costs for traditional public use projects like streets, parks, and sewers, and have all but restricted <br />the use of eminent domain for redevelopment to cases of extreme blight or contamination. <br />The proper operation and long term economic vitality of our cities is dependent on the ability of <br />a city, its citizens and its businesses to continually reinvest and reinvent. Reinvestment and <br />reinvention strategies can occasionally conflict with the priorities of individual residents or <br />business owners. Eminent domain is a critical tool in the reinvestment and reinvention process <br />and without it our cities may deteriorate to unprecedented levels before the public reacts. <br />Metro Cities strongly encourages the Governor and Legislature to revisit eminent domain laws to <br />allow local governments to address redevelopment problems before those conditions become <br />financially impossible to address. Specifically, Metro Cities supports: <br />Clarifying contamination standards; <br />• Developing different standards for redevelopment to include obsolete structures or <br />to reflect the deterioration conditions that currently exist in the metro area; <br />Allowing for the assembly of multiple parcels for redevelopment projects; <br />2019 Legislative Policies <br />33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.