Laserfiche WebLink
Transportation <br />however, greater pressure is being placed on municipalities to participate in cost sharing <br />activities, encumbering an already over -burdened local funding system. When the alternative is <br />not building or maintaining roads, cities bear not only the costs of their local systems but also <br />pay upward of fifty percent of county road projects. Metro Cities supports special or <br />additional funding for cities that have burdens of additional cost participation in projects <br />involving county roads. <br />CSAH eligible roads were designated by county engineers in 1956 and although only 10 percent <br />of the CSAH roads are in the metro area, they account for nearly 50 percent of the vehicle miles <br />traveled. The CSAH formula passed by the Legislature in 2008 increased the amount of CSAH <br />funding for the metropolitan area from 18 percent in 2007 to 21 percent in 2011. The formula <br />helps to better account for needs in the metropolitan region, but is only the first step in <br />addressing needs for additional resources for the region. <br />Metro Cities supports a new CSAH formula more equitably designed to fund the needs of <br />our metropolitan region. <br />5-L Municipal Input/Consent for Trunk Highways and County Roads <br />State statutes direct the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) to submit detailed <br />plans, with city cost estimates, at a point one -and -a -half to two years prior to bid letting, at which <br />time public hearings are held for community input. If MnDOT does not concur with requested <br />changes, it may appeal. Currently, that process would take a maximum of three and a half <br />months and the results of the appeals board are binding on both the city and MnDOT. <br />Metro Cities supports the municipal consent process, and opposes changes to weaken <br />municipal consent or adding another level of government to the consent process. Metro <br />Cities opposes changes to current statutes that would allow MnDOT to disregard the <br />appeals board ruling for state trunk highways. Such a change would significantly minimize <br />MnDOT's need to negotiate in good faith with cities for appropriate project access and alignment <br />and would render the public hearing and appeals process meaningless. Metro Cities also <br />opposes the elimination of the county road municipal consent and appeal process for these <br />reasons. <br />5-M Plat Authority <br />Current law grants counties review and comment authority for access and drainage issues for city <br />plats abutting county roads. <br />Metro Cities opposes any statutory change that would grant counties veto power or that <br />would shorten the 120-day review and permit process time. <br />5-N MnDOT Maintenance Budget <br />The state has failed in its responsibility for maintaining major roads throughout the state by <br />2019 Legislative Policies <br />56 <br />