My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019.04.01 CC Minutes
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2019 CC Minutes
>
2019.04.01 CC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2019 1:24:03 PM
Creation date
4/16/2019 1:24:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
4/1/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for April 1,2019 <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br /> John Waller began by thanking previous mayors and councils that worked to restore ditch <br /> infrastructure. He stated that as drainage authority, the RCWD had done special taxing districts <br /> and this legislation would treat the County as a taxing district. They would still be able to use ad <br /> valorem tax money for some projects, but the legislation would provide a steady floor of money. <br /> Maintenance on drainage systems had been deferred for the past forty years, and if not for <br /> previous councils, they would not be working on Ditch Number 3. The legislation would make for <br /> more accountability, transparency, objectivity, and impartiality. Waller talked about changes that <br /> had been made since he has been on the board, and he talked about some of the work that still <br /> needed to be done on some ditches. He acknowledged there has been a tremendous change in <br /> spending money lately but not if you look back 30-40 years. He asked for Council to support the <br /> legislation. <br /> Weidt said he could see the argument from both sides. He compared it to Hugo's Council <br /> districts and questioned how projects would get done if money raised from each district had to <br /> stay in that district. He acknowledged the relationship with RCWD has improved greatly thanks <br /> to Waller. He pointed out that earlier this evening, a grant was approved from the watershed <br /> district for a water reuse project. RCWD is also doing a ditch project, so Hugo is receiving <br /> money. Weidt stated that the district needed to make decisions as a group and not be limited as to <br /> where the money can be spent. <br /> Klein talked about water quality issues related to water coming out of jurisdictions that are <br /> controlled by others. He felt it was important to keep projects consolidated and support programs <br /> that produce quality water. He stated cost sharing has improved, and they are moving forward. <br /> Hugo has been recognized as a leader and should continue forward with that in mind. Klein said <br /> he would have difficult time supporting the legislation. <br /> Miron agreed and said he appreciated Manager Waller's history and longevity with the district, <br /> and he recognized that things have not always been as balanced as they are now. Regardless what <br /> happens in the legislature, he said it was important to get continued reporting from the District <br /> and information about taxes that are collected and spent, and to make sure the current trend <br /> continues. He said he realized the district is more than one county and one city, and the projects <br /> help all. Miron said the board has done a great job of supporting Hugo, and he wanted that to <br /> continue. <br /> Petryk said she agreed with everything said, and the important thing was that they are moving <br /> forward. She stated there have been issues in the past, but people now realize that the RCWD is <br /> the City's partner, and they have been extremely supportive. She said she agreed on transparency <br /> to show that people are being treated fairly and do see a return on the money they are putting in. <br /> She stated that things have changed over the past four years, and she would like to move forward <br /> instead of backward. She was not in support of the bills. <br /> Klein made motion, Petryk seconded, to draft a letter opposing the house and senate bills. <br /> Ayes: Becky, Klein <br /> Nays: Weidt, Miron <br /> Motion failed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.