My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC Packet 02.28.19
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2019 PC Packets
>
PC Packet 02.28.19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 5:13:30 PM
Creation date
5/6/2019 4:20:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
2/28/2019
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(4) The failure to complete the work in a timely manner, unless a permit extension is obtained or <br />unless the failure to compete the work is due to reasons beyond the permittee's control; or <br />(5) The failure to correct, in a timely manner, work that does not conform to a condition indicated <br />on an order issued pursuant to section 82-315. <br />(b) Written notice of breach. If the City determines that the permittee has committed a substantial <br />breach of a term or condition of any statute, ordinance, rule, regulation or any condition of the permit, <br />the City shall make a written demand upon the permittee to remedy such violation except in the case <br />of emergency determined by the City in which case the city may give such notice as is reasonably <br />practical under the circumstances and thereafter proceed to correct the condition at the permittee's <br />expense. The demand shall state that continued violations may be cause for revocation of the <br />permit. A substantial breach, as stated above, will allow the city, at its discretion, to place additional <br />or revised conditions on the permit to mitigate and remedy the breach. <br />(c) Response to notice of breach. Within 24 hours of receiving notification of the breach, permittee shall <br />provide the city with a plan, acceptable to the City, that will cure the breach. Permittee's failure to so <br />contact the City, or permittee's failure to timely submit an acceptable plan, or permittee's failure to <br />reasonably implement the approved plan, shall be cause for immediate revocation of the permit. <br />(d) Reimbursement of City costs. If a permit is revoked, the permittee shall also reimburse the City for <br />the City's reasonable costs, including restoration costs and the costs of collection and reasonable <br />attorneys' fees incurred in connection with such revocation. <br />(Ord. No. 2010-445, § 2, 4-5-2010) <br />Sec. 82-319. - Mapping data. <br />Each registrant and permittee shall provide mapping information when practical and as requested by <br />the director. Such maps and drawings shall be provided consistent with the City's electronic mapping <br />system when practical or as a condition imposed by the director. Failure to provide maps and drawings <br />pursuant to this subsection shall be grounds for revoking the permit holder's registration. <br />All permits issued for the installation or repair of service laterals, other than minor repairs as defined <br />in Minnesota Rules 7560.0150 subpart 2, shall require the permittee's use of appropriate means of <br />establishing the horizontal locations of installed service laterals, and the service lateral vertical locations <br />in those cases where the director reasonably requires it. Permittees or their subcontractors shall submit to <br />the director evidence satisfactory to the director of the installed service lateral locations. Compliance with <br />this subdivision 2 and with applicable Gopher State One Call law and Minnesota Rules governing service <br />laterals install after December 31, 2005, shall be a condition of any City approval necessary for: <br />(1) Payments to contractors working on a public improvement project including those under Minn. <br />Stats. ch. 429; and <br />(2) City approval of performance under development agreements, or other subdivision or site plan <br />approval under Minn. Stats. ch. 462. The director shall reasonably determine the appropriate <br />method of providing such information to the City. Failure to provide prompt and accurate <br />information on the service laterals installed may result in the revocation of the permit issued for <br />the work or for future permits to the offending permittee or its subcontractors. <br />(Ord. No. 2010-445, § 2, 4-5-2010) <br />Sec. 82-320. - Location and relocation of facilities. <br />(a) Placement, location and relocation of facilities must comply with the Astordinance, with other <br />applicable law, and with Minnesota Rules 7819.3100, 7819.5000 and 7819.5100, to the extent the <br />rules to not limit authority otherwise available to cities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.