My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC Packet 02.28.19
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2019 PC Packets
>
PC Packet 02.28.19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 5:13:30 PM
Creation date
5/6/2019 4:20:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
2/28/2019
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sec. 82-325. - Abandoned and unusable facilities. <br />(a) Discontinued operations. A registrant who has determined to discontinue all or a portion of its <br />operations in the City must provide information satisfactory to the city that the registrant's obligations <br />for its facilities in the right-of-way under this article have been lawfully assumed by another <br />registrant. <br />(b) Removal of abandoned facilities. Any facility that remains nonfunctional or inoperative for a <br />continuous period of six months the system shall be deemed abandoned and shall constitute a <br />public nuisance. Any person who has abandoned facilities in the right-of-way shall remove them from <br />that right-of-way if required in conjunction with other right-of-way repair, excavation, or construction, <br />unless the director waives this requirement. <br />(Ord. No. 2010-445, § 2, 4-5-2010) <br />Sec. 82-326. - Appeal. <br />A right-of-way user that: <br />(1) Has been denied registration; <br />(2) Has been denied a permit; <br />(3) Has had a permit revoked; <br />(4) Believes that the fees imposed are not in conformity with Minn. Stats. § 237.163, subd. 6; or <br />(5) Disputes a determination of the director may have the denial, revocation, fee imposition, or <br />decision reviewed, upon written request, by the City Council. <br />The City Council shall act on a timely written request as soon as reasonably possible. A decision by the <br />City Council affirming the denial, revocation, or fee imposition will be in writing and supported by written <br />findings establishing the reasonableness of the decision. <br />(Ord. No. 2010-445, § 2, 4-5-2010) <br />Secs. 82-327-82-349. - Reserved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.