My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC Packet 02.28.19
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2019 PC Packets
>
PC Packet 02.28.19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 5:13:30 PM
Creation date
5/6/2019 4:20:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
2/28/2019
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(d) Reimbursement of City costs. If a permit is revoked, the permittee shall also reimburse the City for <br />the City's reasonable costs, including restoration costs and the costs of collection and reasonable <br />attorneys' fees incurred in connection with such revocation. <br />(Ord. No. 2010-445, § 2, 4-5-2010) <br />Sec. 82-319. - Mapping data. <br />Each registrant and permittee shall provide mapping information when practical and as requested by <br />the director. Such maps and drawings shall be provided consistent with the City's electronic mapping <br />system when practical or as a condition imposed by the director. Failure to provide maps and drawings <br />pursuant to this subsection shall be grounds for revoking the permit holder's registration. <br />All permits issued for the installation or repair of service laterals, other than minor repairs as defined <br />in Minnesota Rules 7560.0150 subpart 2, shall require the permittee's use of appropriate means of <br />establishing the horizontal locations of installed service laterals, and the service lateral vertical locations <br />in those cases where the director reasonably requires it. Permittees or their subcontractors shall submit to <br />the director evidence satisfactory to the director of the installed service lateral locations. Compliance with <br />this subdivision 2 and with applicable Gopher State One Call law and Minnesota Rules governing service <br />laterals install after December 31, 2005, shall be a condition of any City approval necessary for: <br />(1) Payments to contractors working on a public improvement project including those under Minn. <br />Stats. ch. 429; and <br />(2) City approval of performance under development agreements, or other subdivision or site plan <br />approval under Minn. Stats. ch. 462. The director shall reasonably determine the appropriate <br />method of providing such information to the City. Failure to provide prompt and accurate <br />information on the service laterals installed may result in the revocation of the permit issued for <br />the work or for future permits to the offending permittee or its subcontractors. <br />(Ord. No. 2010-445, § 2, 4-5-2010) <br />Sec. 82-320. - Location and relocation of facilities. <br />(a) Placement, location and relocation of facilities must comply with the ordinance, with other applicable <br />law, and with Minnesota Rules 7819.3100, 7819.5000 and 7819.5100, to the extent the rules to not <br />limit authority otherwise available to cities. <br />(b) Corridors. The City may assign specific corridors within the right-of-way, or any particular segment <br />thereof as may be necessary, for each type of facilities that is or, pursuant to current technology, the <br />city expects will someday be located within the right-of-way. All excavation, obstruction, or other <br />permits issued by the City involving the installation or replacement of facilities shall designate the <br />proper corridor for the facilities at issue. <br />(c) Limitation of space. To protect health, safety, and welfare, or when determined by the City <br />necessary to protect the right-of-way and its current use, the City shall have the power to prohibit or <br />limit the placement of new or additional facilities within the right-of-way. In making such decisions, <br />the City shall strive to the extent possible to accommodate all existing and potential users of the <br />right-of-way, but shall be guided in the City's discretion primarily by considerations of the public <br />interest, the public's needs for the particular utility service, the condition of the right-of-way, and the <br />time of year with respect to essential utilities, the protection of existing facilities in the right-of-way, <br />and future City plans for public improvements and development projects which have been <br />determined to be in the public interest. <br />(Ord. No. 2010-445, § 2, 4-5-2010) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.