My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC Packet 02.28.19
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2019 PC Packets
>
PC Packet 02.28.19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 5:13:30 PM
Creation date
5/6/2019 4:20:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
2/28/2019
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Right-of-way Ordinance Text Amendment <br />Page 2 <br />districts except historic and residential. However, the law also allows cities to manage small <br />wireless facilities through a permitting process, including a collocation agreement, and <br />ordinances. Therefore, the City's permitting process and right-of-way ordinances are an <br />important means of exercising authority of the public ROW. <br />In 2018, staff created a permit application for small wireless facilities and a draft collocation <br />agreement. The City of Hugo is in need of updating its right-of-way ordinance per the new <br />amendment to prepare for the eventual deployment of small wireless facilities within the <br />community. <br />2. SUMMARY OF REVISIONS: <br />With the change in State Statute, there is a defined list of what cities can and cannot do when <br />managing small wireless facilities. <br />What cities can do: <br />• Manage small wireless facilities in the ROW through a permitting process and <br />ordinances. <br />• Charge $150 (plus $25 maintenance fee) per year for collocation agreements on City <br />owned structures. <br />• Deny the placement of a small wireless facility in the ROW based on health, safety, and <br />welfare, or noncompliance with decorative standards. <br />• Use a 90 day review period if the City receives more than 30 facilities in a single seven <br />day period. <br />• Approve/deny some but not all of the 15 facilities that can be applied for in a single <br />consolidated application. <br />• Require the approval of a CUP for ROW uses in single family residential and historic <br />zoning districts. <br />What cities cannot do: <br />• Discriminate among functionally equivalent providers. <br />• Dictate which structures are used other than those proposed in the application. <br />• Use Moratoriums to stall the processing or approval of a small wireless facility permit. <br />• Impose specific height and separation restrictions other than the 50 foot height limit <br />defined by the statute. <br />• Require applicant information if the applicant has submitted a permit in the past and can <br />provide that permit's reference number. <br />• Require additional permits and fees for the maintenance or replacement of small cell <br />facilities. <br />A. Chapter 82 Utilities, Article IV Right of way <br />Definitions <br />Definitions were added to the ordinance to clarify the meaning of a small wireless facility and <br />a micro wireless facility, both of which are now permitted uses in the public ROW. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.