Laserfiche WebLink
The Meadows at Hugo Sketch Plan <br />Wetlands <br />The City's Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) has approved the wetland delineation for the <br />property. The sketch plan shows a number of impacts to wetlands that appear to be avoidable. The <br />developer has stated that they will evaluate the site to preserve to the maximum extent possible the <br />sites natural features (wetland, floodplain, shoreland, etc) as part of the PUD request. A wetland <br />replacement plan would need to be applied and approved by the TEP if the developer plans to <br />impact any wetlands on the site. This will be evaluated as the project moves forward. <br />Stormwater Management/Water Re -Use <br />The developer is proposing to have a stormwater management plan through the construction of <br />ponds within the site. Staff will be working with the developer, as this projects moves forward, as <br />it relates to stormwater management, floodplain, and infiltration. <br />The developer has also indicated that they will be using stormwater for irrigation purposes within <br />the development. If the system is feasible, from a water availability and design standpoint, it will <br />require additional review and analysis as the project moves forward. <br />5. CONCLUSION/ RECOMMENDATIONS: <br />The developer has been working with staff to develop a basic sketch plan for informal comments. <br />The development currently meets the density requirements for the land use designation. The <br />developer is requesting flexibly on lot sizes and setbacks. <br />Although the applicant has done a good job providing various lot sizes, openspace and trail <br />connections, and proposes a stormwater reuse system to irrigate the development, it is in staff's <br />opinion that that the layout of the proposed development should be revised based on Staff <br />comments and the comments from the Commissions. Staff recommends the following: <br />1. Staff recommends that the Commission offer to make the City property available for <br />construction of the street to access the site at the developer's expense, but not allow the <br />development of the lots as shown on the plan. <br />2. Although the location change to the trunk sanitary sewer connection to the Met Council <br />interceptor requires evaluation and approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, staff <br />believes this to be a reasonable alternative to serving the surrounding area. Provided that <br />the utilities are extended to the east property line and easements are dedicated for future <br />extension of the utilities to 165th Street. <br />3. Staff recommend the applicant plan the development to reduce the impacts to the natural <br />environment. Such as, reducing the amount of wetlands to be impacted with the <br />development. <br />4. Staff recommends that assessments be evaluated at the time 165th Street is improved, if <br />necessary, but does not recommended exempting properties from an assessment. <br />5. Staff is comfortable with the lot sizes, however recommends that the 5 foot side yard <br />setback be further evaluated with as the project moves forward and home elevations and <br />building footprints are provided. <br />